Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2911 - 2920 of 12418 results
Blume Construction, Inc. v. State
2015 ND 285
Highlight: A corporation may not be represented by a non-attorney agent in a legal proceeding, and any legal documents signed and filed by a corporation's non-attorney agent are void. |
Knorr v. Norberg (cross ref. 20130084)
2015 ND 284
Highlight: A long-term lease with an option to purchase real property ordinarily requires a signed written agreement. |
State v. Hennings
2015 ND 283 Highlight: The law is violated when a defendant, under the influence of alcohol, is able to direct the movement of a vehicle in an area to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use. |
Disciplinary Board v. Johnston
2015 ND 282 Highlight: A law firm employing a paralegal who formerly was employed by another firm may continue representing clients whose interests conflict with the interests of clients of the former employer on whose matters the paralegal worked, as long as the employing firm screens the nonlawyer from information about or participating in matters involving those clients. |
State v. Walker
2015 ND 281 Highlight: A receipt of a general consent to search a vehicle reasonably extends to any container in that vehicle which may contain the object of that search. |
State v. Asbach
2015 ND 280
Highlight: A defendant is not illegally seized while an officer is conducting duties related to the purpose of a traffic stop. |
Chisholm v. State
2015 ND 279 Highlight: To prevail on a post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance, the petitioner must prove that (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance. |
State v. Acker
2015 ND 278
Highlight: Before admitting a defendant's prior conviction, the district court must weigh the conviction's probative value against its prejudicial effect in accordance with N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(1)(B). |
Sargent County Water Resource District v. Mathews, et al.
2015 ND 277
Highlight: The primary purpose in interpreting a deed is to ascertain and effectuate the grantor's intent. When a deed is unambiguous, the parties' intent is determined from the instrument itself. |
Bye v. Robinette
2015 ND 276
Highlight: Findings of fact must demonstrate that the district court followed the child support guidelines when imputing income. |