Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2951 - 2960 of 12446 results
State v. Gackle
2015 ND 271 Highlight: Section 39-20-07, N.D.C.C., is not the only method for offering blood test results into evidence. Blood test results may also be admitted under normal evidentiary rules. |
Weigel v. Weigel
2015 ND 270
Highlight: In a divorce proceeding, a district court's valuation and distribution of marital property will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Anderson v. Baker, et al.
2015 ND 269 |
Johnson, et al. v. Buskohl Construction, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 268
Highlight: If a district court does not make detailed findings when admitting evidence under the residual exception to hearsay, an appellate court may review the record to determine whether the prerequisites to admissibility have been met. |
Guardianship and Conservatorship of M.E. (Confidential)
2015 ND 267
Highlight: Substantial compliance with the statute for the appointment of a guardian and conservator is required. |
State v. Moreno
2015 ND 266 Highlight: Criminal judgment for refusal to submit to chemical testing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Murray v. State
2015 ND 265 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20150114 & 20150115)
2015 ND 264
Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) and Lehman v. State, 2014 ND 103, 847 N.W.2d 119. |
State v. Birnbaum
2015 ND 263 Highlight: A criminal judgment for assault, violation of an order prohibiting contact, theft of property, and failure to halt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Busby
2015 ND 262 Highlight: Criminal judgment for assault summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Chisholm, 2012 ND 147, 16, 818 N.W.2d 707. |