Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2901 - 3000 of 12418 results
Interest of Thill (cross-reference w/ 20130291)
2015 ND 295 Highlight: A district court must make specific findings of fact supporting its determination that a defendant remains a sexually dangerous individual. Generally referencing medical reports without explaining which facts it considered in its determination is not sufficient. |
Butterfield v. Levi
2015 ND 294 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of A.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Consolidated w/20150318)
2015 ND 293 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Musick v. Levi
2015 ND 292 Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7). |
Jodoin v. Levi
2015 ND 291 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Johnson v. State
2015 ND 290 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. Ward
2015 ND 289 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Disciplinary Board v. Varriano
2015 ND 288 Highlight: Lawyer reinstatement ordered. |
Fleck, et al. v. Missouri River Royalty Corp., et al.
2015 ND 287
Highlight: The term "production" as used in a "so long thereafter" clause and any related savings clause extending an oil and gas lease generally will be interpreted to mean "production in paying quantities." |
Disciplinary Board v. Huisman
2015 ND 286 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Blume Construction, Inc. v. State
2015 ND 285
Highlight: A corporation may not be represented by a non-attorney agent in a legal proceeding, and any legal documents signed and filed by a corporation's non-attorney agent are void. |
Knorr v. Norberg (cross ref. 20130084)
2015 ND 284
Highlight: A long-term lease with an option to purchase real property ordinarily requires a signed written agreement. |
State v. Hennings
2015 ND 283 Highlight: The law is violated when a defendant, under the influence of alcohol, is able to direct the movement of a vehicle in an area to which the public has a right of access for vehicular use. |
Disciplinary Board v. Johnston
2015 ND 282 Highlight: A law firm employing a paralegal who formerly was employed by another firm may continue representing clients whose interests conflict with the interests of clients of the former employer on whose matters the paralegal worked, as long as the employing firm screens the nonlawyer from information about or participating in matters involving those clients. |
State v. Walker
2015 ND 281 Highlight: A receipt of a general consent to search a vehicle reasonably extends to any container in that vehicle which may contain the object of that search. |
State v. Asbach
2015 ND 280
Highlight: A defendant is not illegally seized while an officer is conducting duties related to the purpose of a traffic stop. |
Chisholm v. State
2015 ND 279 Highlight: To prevail on a post-conviction claim of ineffective assistance, the petitioner must prove that (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the petitioner was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance. |
State v. Acker
2015 ND 278
Highlight: Before admitting a defendant's prior conviction, the district court must weigh the conviction's probative value against its prejudicial effect in accordance with N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(1)(B). |
Sargent County Water Resource District v. Mathews, et al.
2015 ND 277
Highlight: The primary purpose in interpreting a deed is to ascertain and effectuate the grantor's intent. When a deed is unambiguous, the parties' intent is determined from the instrument itself. |
Bye v. Robinette
2015 ND 276
Highlight: Findings of fact must demonstrate that the district court followed the child support guidelines when imputing income. |
Yahna v. Altru Health System
2015 ND 275
Highlight: The presumption of at-will employment may be modified by an employment handbook creating contractual rights to employment, or by the statutory proscription against unlawful age discrimination. |
Rooks v. Robb
2015 ND 274
Highlight: Affidavits must be made on personal knowledge and contain more than conclusory statements to raise a genuine issue of material fact. |
Williamson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 273
Highlight: Foundation for the admission of blood test results may be laid by a designee of the director of the state crime lab who has been authorized to sign and certify records. |
Huether, et al. v. Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. (cross-reference w/20150029)
2015 ND 272
Highlight: Insurance coverage for "direct physical loss or damage" is not ambiguous as a matter of law. A district court does not err in finding the ordinary meaning of the phrase does not include loss-of-use coverage. |
State v. Gackle
2015 ND 271 Highlight: Section 39-20-07, N.D.C.C., is not the only method for offering blood test results into evidence. Blood test results may also be admitted under normal evidentiary rules. |
Weigel v. Weigel
2015 ND 270
Highlight: In a divorce proceeding, a district court's valuation and distribution of marital property will not be reversed on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Anderson v. Baker, et al.
2015 ND 269 |
Johnson, et al. v. Buskohl Construction, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 268
Highlight: If a district court does not make detailed findings when admitting evidence under the residual exception to hearsay, an appellate court may review the record to determine whether the prerequisites to admissibility have been met. |
Guardianship and Conservatorship of M.E. (Confidential)
2015 ND 267
Highlight: Substantial compliance with the statute for the appointment of a guardian and conservator is required. |
State v. Moreno
2015 ND 266 Highlight: Criminal judgment for refusal to submit to chemical testing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Murray v. State
2015 ND 265 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Wheeler v. State (consolidated w/20150114 & 20150115)
2015 ND 264
Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) and Lehman v. State, 2014 ND 103, 847 N.W.2d 119. |
State v. Birnbaum
2015 ND 263 Highlight: A criminal judgment for assault, violation of an order prohibiting contact, theft of property, and failure to halt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Busby
2015 ND 262 Highlight: Criminal judgment for assault summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Chisholm, 2012 ND 147, 16, 818 N.W.2d 707. |
State v. Ford
2015 ND 261 Highlight: District court order for revocation of probation summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Interest of L.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 260 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Rusgrove v. Goter
2015 ND 259 Highlight: A district court's summary judgment dismissing a plaintiff's lawsuit with prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
In the Interest of A.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 258 Highlight: A district court order adopting a referee's order that transferred the case from juvenile court to adult court is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Sall v. Sall (cross-reference w/ 20100360 & 20120448)
2015 ND 257 Highlight: A district court judgment adjusting the monthly amount of child support payments is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of T.A.G.
2015 ND 256 Highlight: A district court order for continued commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Leno v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2015 ND 255
Highlight: When the specimen submitter's checklist is not sent to the Department of Transportation or presented as evidence at the administrative hearing, testimony from the specimen submitter can be used to show scrupulous compliance with the methods approved by the state crime laboratory director. |
Capes v. Capes
2015 ND 254 Highlight: To modify parenting time, the moving party must demonstrate that a material change in circumstances has occurred since entry of the previous parenting time order and that the modification is in the best interests of the child. |
Estate of Amundson, et al.
2015 ND 253
Highlight: The district court is considered an expert in determining the value of reasonable attorney's fees for services rendered to an estate, and its decision will not be overturned on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. |
Poppe v. Stockert, et al.
2015 ND 252
Highlight: A landlord may dispose of a tenant's abandoned personal property under N.D.C.C. 47-16-30.1. The landlord must retain property valued at more than $1,500 for the time required by statute. |
Gronland v. Gronland (cross-reference w/19940193)
2015 ND 251
Highlight: Jurisdiction to modify spousal support does not extend beyond the support period, unless the court reserves that jurisdiction. |
Olson v. Levi
2015 ND 250 Highlight: The report and notice form forwarded to the department of transportation must include adequate probable cause information showing the arrestee was in actual physical control of or was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol to provide the department authority to suspend driving privileges. |
City of Jamestown v. Hanson
2015 ND 249 Highlight: Testimony regarding blood-alcohol testing procedures may be admitted into evidence without satisfying the statutory requirements for admission of blood-alcohol test results. |
Tidd v. Kroshus
2015 ND 248
Highlight: Jury instructions on issues not supported by the evidence are erroneous but arereversible error only when they are prejudicial or mislead the jury. |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of V.A.M.
2015 ND 247 Highlight: A district court's decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the appellate court is unable to understand the rationale underlying the district court's decision. |
Interest of W.M. (Confidential)
2015 ND 246 Highlight: District court order finding W.M. mentally ill and in need of treatment with medication summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Interest of B.K. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 245 Highlight: Mental health commitment for up to 90 days is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Dubray v. State
2015 ND 244 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of Bartole (cross-ref w/ 20110243)
2015 ND 243 Highlight: A district court order for continued commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Meyer, et al. v. Engebretson, et al.
2015 ND 242 Highlight: Summary judgment deciding ownership of mineral interests is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Kitzan v. State
2015 ND 241 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Berg
2015 ND 240 Highlight: District court order for revocation of probation and amended criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Wedemeyer v. State
2015 ND 239 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Border Resources, LLC v. Irish Oil & Gas, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 238
Highlight: A fiduciary duty, including a corresponding duty of loyalty and honesty, arises between an oil company and its landman based on a confidential relationship. |
State v. Montplaisir
2015 ND 237
Highlight: An information is sufficient if it sets forth the offense in the words of the statute and is specific enough to provide a defendant with notice of the pending charges to enable the defendant to prepare a defense. |
Klein v. Klein
2015 ND 236
Highlight: Under the child support guidelines, "self-employment" means employment that results in an obligor earning income from any business organization or entity which the obligor is, to a significant extent, able to directly or indirectly control. |
State v. Guttormson
2015 ND 235
Highlight: Statements admitted to prove a point other than the truth of the matter asserted are not testimonial hearsay statements. |
State v. Chase
2015 ND 234 Highlight: A trial court does not abuse its discretion by excluding evidence of prior sexual activity between a victim and defendant when the defendant has not provided the required notice of intent to offer such evidence. |
Interest of M.R., a Child (CONFIDENTIAL)
2015 ND 233
Highlight: The juvenile court is not required to second-guess an attorney's statement regarding his client's decision not to appear by telephone at a termination of parental rights trial. |
Norby v. Estate of Kuykendall, et al.
2015 ND 232 Highlight: When a boundary is fixed by a deed at a specified line without reference to the water, the grantee cannot claim accretions beyond that line. |
Greywind v. State
2015 ND 231
Highlight: A district court summarily dismissing a post-conviction relief application under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-09(1) must rely on information found solely within the application. |
State v. Morales
2015 ND 230
Highlight: A warrantless blood-alcohol test is unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. |
Grigg v. Grigg
2015 ND 229 Highlight: Unless the opposing party's counter-affidavits conclusively establish the movant's allegations have no credibility, the district court must accept the truth of the moving party's allegations. |
Keller v. State
2015 ND 228
Highlight: A motion to correct an illegal sentence cannot be used to attack the underlying conviction. |
State v. Korynta
2015 ND 227 Highlight: Conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Interest of E.V. (Confidential)
2015 ND 226 Highlight: District court judgment finding a child is deprived is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Holverson v. Lundberg
2015 ND 225 Highlight: There is not jurisdiction to hear appeal from a judgment where unadjudicated claim has not been decided by district court. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 1, Southwest Judicial District
2015 ND 224 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Dickinson. |
State v. New Holland
2015 ND 223 Highlight: A person seeking compensatory remedial contempt sanctions against the state or a state employee must comply with the statutory requirements for claims against the state. |
Disciplinary Board v. Matson (consolidated w/ 20150220-20150221)
2015 ND 222 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Judicial District
2015 ND 221 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bottineau. |
Kuntz v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 220
Highlight: A lawyer's violation of the rules of professional conduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence. |
State v. Weight
2015 ND 219
Highlight: Double Jeopardy prohibits successive prosecutions and punishments for the same criminal offense. |
Matter of Hehn (cross-reference 20110053; 20120070; 20120212; 20130055;20130143)
2015 ND 218
Highlight: When a party fails to raise an issue before the district court, even a constitutional issue, an appellate court generally will not address the issue on appeal. A party must do more than submit bare assertions to adequately raise constitutional issues. |
Gerber v. Disciplinary Board
2015 ND 217 Highlight: Under the rules of professional conduct, a lawyer who is not admitted to practice in this jurisdiction is prohibited from representing or holding out to the public that he is admitted to practice law in this jurisdiction. |
Hale v. City of Minot
2015 ND 216
Highlight: A local governing body's decision is affirmed unless the local body acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably, or there is not substantial evidence supporting the decision. |
Freidig, et al. v. Weed, et al.
2015 ND 215
Highlight: A warranty deed that does not express the parties' intent may be reformed on the ground of mutual mistake. |
Gabaldon-Cochran v. Cochran
2015 ND 214
Highlight: Distribution of marital property does not need to be equal, but the distribution must be equitable and a substantial disparity must be explained. |
State v. Weinmann (consolidated w/ 20140440)
2015 ND 213 Highlight: The reliability of informants within the criminal milieu must be established. |
State v. Rufus
2015 ND 212
Highlight: The word "obtain," in the context of the human trafficking statute, encompasses acquiring temporary custody of a person for the purpose of engaging in commercial sex acts with that person. |
State v. Pogue
2015 ND 211
Highlight: A motion to reconsider does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal from an order suppressing evidence in a criminal matter. |
Winter v. Solheim, et al.
2015 ND 210 Highlight: If a small claims court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of an action, a writ of certiorari may not be used to review an alleged erroneous decision by the small claims court. |
Olson, et al. v. Alerus Financial Corp., et al.
2015 ND 209 Highlight: A real estate agent owes fiduciary duties to a client, and the legislature intended to create a private remedy to enforce violations of those duties. |
State v. Zacher
2015 ND 208 Highlight: Plain view is a recognized exception to the search warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement officers to seize a clearly incriminating object without a warrant if the officers are lawfully in a position from which they can view an object and the object's incriminating character is immediately apparent. |
Matter of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-reference w/20100366 & 20120199)
2015 ND 207 Highlight: The least restrictive treatment available for a sexually dangerous individual is initially made by the executive director of the department of human services, but the individual may challenge continued commitment if statutory requirements are being violated. |
Interest of Whitetail
2015 ND 206
Highlight: A sexually dangerous individual who is committed is to be placed in the least restrictive available treatment facility or program. |
Anderson v. WSI
2015 ND 205
Highlight: A vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate if it meets the statutory requirements and gives the injured worker a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment. |
Moody, et al. v. Sundley
2015 ND 204
Highlight: All the elements for adverse possession must be satisfied for a claim of adverse possession under any of the statutory provisions, and if any element is not satisfied the possession will not confer title. |
Gray v. Berg
2015 ND 203 Highlight: A peremptory demand for a change of judge differs from a demand for a change of judge based on bias. Peremptory demands are untimely if filed more than 10 days after notice of assignment or reassignment of a judge for trial of a case, notice that trial had been scheduled, or date of service of an ex parte order in the case signed by the judge against whom the demand is filed. Allegations of bias are not subject to the same time constraints. |
Messer, et al. v. B&B Hot Oil Service, Inc., et al.
2015 ND 202
Highlight: For negligence claims based on defective products, the focus is on whether or not the conduct of the manufacturer or seller falls below the standard of reasonable care. One who has been injured by a product may seek to hold the manufacturer or seller liable on the theory that the design of the product made it dangerous and, apart from whether it was negligent in its design, negligence is inhered in a failure to warn of the danger. |
State v. Clark
2015 ND 201 Highlight: A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving the prosecution the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, no rational fact finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Johnson, et al. v. Shield, et al.
2015 ND 200
Highlight: Reservations or exceptions of property interests may appear in any part of a deed, including the warranty clause. |
BAHA Petroleum Consulting Corp. v. Job Service
2015 ND 199 Highlight: Whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee is a mixed question of fact and law, and the employer bears the burden of showing the worker is an independent contractor. |
State v. Morel
2015 ND 198 Highlight: Conviction of refusal to submit to a chemical test is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Kordonowy
2015 ND 197
Highlight: The implied consent statute criminalizing refusal to consent to chemical testing is not unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment or N.D. Constitution article I, section 8, and it is not unconstitutionally vague. |
State v. Kardor
2015 ND 196
Highlight: A Brady v. Maryland violation is established if a defendant proves: (1) the government possessed evidence favorable to the defendant; (2) the defendant did not possess the evidence and could not have obtained it with reasonable diligence; (3) the prosecution suppressed the evidence; and (4) a reasonable probability exists that the outcome of the proceedings would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed. |