Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
311 - 320 of 12382 results
Rennie v. State
2024 ND 69 Highlight: A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Garaas, et al. v. Continental Resources, et al.
2024 ND 68 Highlight: We will not consider an appeal in a multi-claim lawsuit where the district court order disposes of fewer than all the claims against all the parties unless the court has determined that a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) is appropriate. |
Urrabazo v. State
2024 ND 67
Highlight: A district court judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is affirmed. |
State v. Freeman
2024 ND 66
Highlight: A motion for mistrial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion or a manifest injustice would result. Granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be resorted to when a fundamental defect or occurrence in the trial proceedings exists that makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice. |
Kemmet v. Kemmet
2024 ND 65
Highlight: A divorce judgment is reversed in part and remanded for clarification of the district court’s findings regarding equitable distribution of the marital estate and a correct accounting of the distribution. |
State v. Alameen
2024 ND 64 |
State v. Alameen
2024 ND 64
Highlight: When asserting a claim of obvious error, a defendant must show: (1) error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error affects the defendant’s substantial rights, if there is no error there is no reason to go further into the analysis. |
Adoption of T.J.R. and B.L.R. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2024 ND 63
Highlight: A district court order terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. § 14-15-19 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Cote v. Cote
2024 ND 62 Highlight: If the district court determines a material change in circumstances has occurred, the court must consider whether changing primary residential responsibility is necessary to serve the child’s best interests. When a trial court does not make required findings, it errs as a matter of law, and it is necessary to remand for additional findings. |
Interest of S.S.C.
2024 ND 61 Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |