Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3201 - 3210 of 12418 results
Deckert v. McCormick, et al.
2014 ND 231
Highlight: To obtain an enforceable right to the property under an option, the optionee must exercise the option within the time and upon the terms and conditions provided in the option agreement. |
State v. Horn
2014 ND 230
Highlight: Even if a party has raised an unsuccessful challenge in a pretrial motion, in order to preserve the issue for appeal, the party must renew the objection when the evidence is offered at trial. |
Frey v. Frey (cross-reference w/20120378)
2014 ND 229
Highlight: A district court's denial of a motion to modify primary residential responsibility will be affirmed, unless clearly erroneous. |
State v. Brandborg
2014 ND 228 Highlight: Hunting on posted land without permission in violation of N.D.C.C. 20.1-01-18 is a strict liability offense. |
Abelmann, et al. v. SmartLease USA, L.L.C.
2014 ND 227 Highlight: A district court's factual findings must be adequate to understand the basis for the court's decision. |
Podrygula, et al. v. Bray, et al.
2014 ND 226
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
Schmitt, et al. v. Schmitt, et al.
2014 ND 225 Highlight: Without a transcript, the record is considered when reviewing whether a district court's findings are clearly erroneous. |
State v. Nagel
2014 ND 224 Highlight: There is no logical difference between a pre-arrest onsite screening test and a post-arrest chemical test in terms of determining voluntariness of consent under the implied consent statute. |
Guardianship of P.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20140167-20140170)
2014 ND 223
Highlight: Although it is preferable for trial courts to prepare their own findings of fact, a trial court will not be reversed for adopting proposed findings prepared by counsel. |
George v. George
2014 ND 222 Highlight: A district court has permissive or non-mandatory authority to grant a restraining order if it finds reasonable grounds to believe a respondent has engaged in disorderly conduct. |