Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3641 - 3650 of 12446 results
Waslaski v. State
2013 ND 64 Highlight: A district court judgment summarily dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Matter of Emelia Hirsch Trust (Cross-reference w/20080209,20120141,20120241)
2013 ND 63 Highlight: An order denying a motion to vacate an order reforming a trust is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4). |
Dawson v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2013 ND 62
Highlight: Hearsay statements may not be admitted under the present sense impression exception when a sufficient lapse in time has occurred between the event and the declarant's statement, allowing for reflective thought. |
Interest of M.H.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 61
Highlight: The Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution bars review of a juvenile court finding that a juvenile who committed a delinquent act is not in need of treatment or rehabilitation. |
Larson, et al. v. Norheim, et al.
2013 ND 60
Highlight: The owners of a mineral interest may preserve their interest by recording a statement of claim within sixty days of the publication of a notice of lapse of mineral interest. |
Kruckenberg v. State (cross-reference w/20080106 & 20110333)
2013 ND 59 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Woodward v. Woodward
2013 ND 58
Highlight: When deciding whether spousal support is appropriate, even if a spouse can be rehabilitated, a court may award permanent spousal support to ensure one party does not bear the brunt of the overall reduction in standard of living. |
K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co.
2013 ND 57
Highlight: In an insurance policy, an exception to an exclusion may result in coverage, but is applicable only if the policy initially grants coverage and an exclusion precluding coverage applies. |
Waslaski v. State
2013 ND 56 Highlight: Arguments raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered by this Court. |
State v. Farrell
2013 ND 55 Highlight: The Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act provides no relief by dismissing criminal judgments entered before the request for disposition of charges, nor does it make available monetary relief. |