Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
361 - 370 of 12486 results
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Hoge Farm (cons. w/20230149, 162-167 & 169-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Hoge (cons. w/20230149, 162-168 & 170-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Carrels (cons. w/20230149, 162-169 & 171-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Staroba, et al. (cons. w/20230149, 162-170 & 172-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Jordheim, et al. (cons. w/20230149, 162-171 & 173-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Hayen (cons. w/20230149, 162-172 & 174-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Waloch (cons. w/20230149, 162-173 & 175-176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. Waloch, et al. (cons. w/20230149, 162-174 & 20230176)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
SCS Carbon Transport v. SPLJ (cons. w/20230149, 20230162-20230175)
2024 ND 109
Highlight: Judgment confirming right of entry for pre-condemnation examination and survey was not equivalent to a perpetual easement, because the authorized purposes all had a definite end point. |
|
State v. Doyle
2024 ND 108 Highlight: A witness testifies as an expert when the witness's answers are rooted exclusively in the witness's expertise or is not a product of the witness's investigation but instead reflects the witness's specialized knowledge. Under Rule 16(a)(1)(F), N.D.R.Crim.P, expert witness summaries must describe the witness's opinions, the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness's qualifications. The State's failure to comply with Rule 16(a)(1)(F) may impede a defendant's ability to prepare the defendant's defense. |