Opinions

State v. Bentz 2013 ND 43
Docket No.: 20120345
Filing Date: 4/4/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: Criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Froistad v. Schmalenberger, et al. 2013 ND 42
Docket No.: 20120381
Filing Date: 4/4/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order summarily dismissing Froistad's petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Gaede v. State 2013 ND 41
Docket No.: 20120326
Filing Date: 4/4/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court judgment denying an applicant's petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Estate of Dionne (cross-reference w/20090016 and 20100353) 2013 ND 40
Docket No.: 20120249
Filing Date: 3/18/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A will does not need to be admitted to probate when a valid distribution agreement signed by all parties with a possible claim in the estate disposes of all property in the estate.
The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel prevent relitigation of issues or claims previously decided.

Disciplinary Board v. Gross 2013 ND 39
Docket No.: 20120456
Filing Date: 3/8/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer publicly reprimanded.

Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort, et al. 2013 ND 38
Docket No.: 20120163
Filing Date: 3/4/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The time for filing a claim for an unlawful employment practice under Title VII or the Human Rights Act depends on whether the claim raises discrete discriminatory or retaliatory acts or alleges a hostile work environment.
Discrete discriminatory acts are not actionable if time-barred, even when they are related to acts alleged in timely filed charges, and each discrete discriminatory act starts a new period for filing charges alleging that act.
A hostile work environment claim is composed of a series of separate acts that collectively constitute one unlawful employment practice. In deciding whether a hostile work environment exists, a court looks to all the circumstances, including the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress requires proof of (1) extreme and outrageous conduct that is (2) intentional or reckless and causes (3) severe emotional distress.
A plaintiff claiming negligent infliction of emotional distress must also show bodily harm.

Hanisch v. Kroshus 2013 ND 37
Docket No.: 20120251
Filing Date: 3/1/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A district court has discretion in deciding to grant a disorderly conduct restraining order and to conduct a hearing on a petition for an order.
The district court may grant a disorderly conduct restraining order if the petitioner complies with the statutory procedural requirements, and if after a hearing the court finds reasonable grounds to believe the respondent has engaged in disorderly conduct.
Disorderly conduct means intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that are intended to adversely affect the safety, security, or privacy of another person but does not include constitutionally protected activity.

Mees v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation 2013 ND 36
Docket No.: 20120348
Filing Date: 2/28/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The Intoxilyzer test record and checklist is presumed to show fair administration of the approved method until the defendant shows that the evidence as a whole clearly negates the presumed fact.
If a fact-finder can draw reasonable inferences from the evidence and conclude the subject could not have eaten, drank, or smoked, the 20-minute wait requirement has been met.

Barrett, et al. v. Gilbertson 2013 ND 35
Docket No.: 20120279
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A party claiming a breach of contract must prove the existence of a contract, a breach of the contract, and damages which flow from the breach.
In interpreting a contract, the court may consider proof of the existence of a separate oral stipulation or agreement as to any matter on which the written contract was silent and which is not inconsistent with its terms if, from the circumstances of the case, the court infers that the parties did not intend the document to be a complete and final statement of the whole of the transaction between them.
When one party prevents the other party's performance of a term of a contract, it excuses the nonperformance and provides a defense in a suit for breach by the nonperformance.

Davis v. State (cross-reference w/20080331 & 20090093) 2013 ND 34
Docket No.: 20120272
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Discovery in the post-conviction context requires good cause and may be used only to the extent and in the manner the district court has ordered.
To obtain discovery under the statutory good cause standard: (1) the evidence sought to be discovered, if established, must allow the applicant to obtain post-conviction relief, and (2) contain specific and particularized allegations.
Post-conviction relief may be granted when evidence, not previously presented and heard, exists requiring vacation of the conviction or sentence in the interest of justice.
Post-conviction relief under N.D.C.C. 29-32.1-01(1)(e) is similar to a N.D.R.Crim.P. 33 request for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, and a defendant must show: (1) the evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to learn about the evidence at the time of trial was not the result of the defendant's lack of diligence; (3) the newly discovered evidence is material to the issues at trial; and (4) the weight and quality of the newly discovered evidence would likely result in an acquittal.

Bakken, et al. v. Duchscher, et al. 2013 ND 33
Docket No.: 20120232
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Extrinsic evidence may not be used to vary or contradict the terms of an unambiguous agreement or to create an ambiguity.
The party invoking laches has the burden of proving he was prejudiced because his position has become so changed during the delay that he cannot be restored to the status quo.

Interest of S.R.L. 2013 ND 32
Docket No.: 20120282
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: An award of joint residential responsibility will be affirmed if supported by sufficient findings of fact consistent with the children's best interests.
Uncooperative parents may be awarded joint residential responsibility when it is in the child's best interests.

Guardianship of J.S.L.F. 2013 ND 31
Docket No.: 20120162
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A guardianship proceeding is an inappropriate method for testing the fitness of a parent.
To prove a parent's rights to his or her child have been suspended by circumstances due to abandonment, the petitioner must satisfy the same standards to prove abandonment required in the Uniform Juvenile Court Act and the Revised Uniform Adoption Act.

Riemers v. Jaeger 2013 ND 30
Docket No.: 20120353
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A party seeking writs of mandamus, prohibition, or injunction must demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested.
Injunctive relief must state its terms specifically and describe in reasonable detail the acts restrained or required.
A state official is not required to request an attorney general's written opinion for all legal questions that may arise during the course of the official's discharge of public duties.

Hageman v. Hageman 2013 ND 29
Docket No.: 20120183
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court's decision to modify primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review.
Strong public policy favors prompt and peaceful resolution of divorce disputes and generates a judicial bias in favor of the adoption of a stipulated agreement of the parties.

Morrow v. Ziegler 2013 ND 28
Docket No.: 20120323
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The requirement that an officer include his or her observation that a driver's body contained alcohol on the report and notice is basic and mandatory for the Department of Transportation to have authority to suspend the driver's license for refusal to submit to an onsite screening test.
Allowing the Department to infer elements that are basic and mandatory without any factual basis on the report to support the inference slants the law too much toward the Department's convenience.

Burgard v. Burgard 2013 ND 27
Docket No.: 20120285
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A motion made under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is the exclusive remedial procedure to set aside a default judgment.
On direct appeal from a default judgment granted under N.D.R.Civ.P. 55, the standard of review is limited to whether "irregularities appear on the face of the judgment roll."

Matter of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref. w/20100366) 2013 ND 26
Docket No.: 20120199
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Whether an individual engaged in sexually predatory conduct is barred by res judicata from being relitigated on a petition for discharge.

Dahl v. State (Consolidated w/20120211)(Cross-reference w/20090262) 2013 ND 25
Docket No.: 20120209
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a defendant's request for a bifurcated trial in a case in which there is an issue of lack of criminal responsibility.
When the issue of lack of criminal responsibility is submitted to the trier of fact, N.D.C.C. 12.1-04.1-18 provides for the appropriate form of the verdict or finding and requires the trier of fact to find the defendant not guilty by lack of criminal responsibility if the trier of fact finds the defendant committed the offense but was not criminally responsible.

Olson, et al. v. Job Service, et al. 2013 ND 24
Docket No.: 20120250
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Unemployment/Job Service
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The phrase "a claimant's work stoppage dispute of any kind" in N.D.C.C. 52-06-02(4) refers to employee-initiated work stoppages, and an employer's lockout of its employees as a result of a labor dispute is not an employee-initiated work stoppage.

State v. Kusy 2013 ND 23
Docket No.: 20120377
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment for luring a minor by computer and for sexual assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Flah 2013 ND 22
Docket No.: 20120357
Filing Date: 2/26/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

In the Matter of Finstad (CONFIDENTIAL) 2013 ND 21
Docket No.: 20130051
Filing Date: 2/15/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Transferred to incapacity to practice law status.

Disciplinary Board v. McDonagh (Cross-ref. w/ 20110167,20120237 & 20120238) 2013 ND 20
Docket No.: 20120445
Filing Date: 2/13/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer discipline ordered.

Reciprocal Discipline of Kleinsmith 2013 ND 19
Docket No.: 20130019
Filing Date: 2/12/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reprimand and probation ordered.

Reciprocal Discipline of Kitchen 2013 ND 18
Docket No.: 20130018
Filing Date: 2/13/2013
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

A.G. Golden, et al. v. SM Energy Company 2013 ND 17
Docket No.: 20120265
Filing Date: 2/1/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An area of mutual interest clause is not a covenant that runs with the land, but is a personal covenant that is enforceable only between the original parties to the agreement.
An assignment is an expression of intention by the assignor that his duty shall immediately pass to the assignee, and the benefitted party's consent to the transfer can be manifested either expressly or by implication.
An assignee is responsible only for the obligations of the assignor which the assignee contracts to undertake.
A district court cannot grant relief on the basis of issues that are neither pleaded nor voluntarily litigated.
A well operator is not automatically insulated from liability for underpayment of royalties simply because the incorrect payments were made in accordance with an executed division order.

Capps, et al. v. Weflen, et al. 2013 ND 16
Docket No.: 20120184
Filing Date: 1/29/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) should not be routinely granted and is reserved for cases involving unusual circumstances where failure to allow an immediate appeal would create a demonstrated prejudice or hardship.

Dakota Heritage Bank v. Pankonin, et al. 2013 ND 15
Docket No.: 20120335
Filing Date: 1/28/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Foreclosure
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court order denying a motion for relief from summary judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Riedlinger, et al. v. Steam Brothers, Inc. 2013 ND 14
Docket No.: 20120111
Filing Date: 1/28/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A contract is ambiguous if rational arguments can be made for different interpretations of the contract.
If a contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be considered to determine the parties' intent, and the terms of the contract and the parties' intent become questions of fact.

Investors Title Ins. Co. v. Herzig, et al. (Cons. w/20120214) 2013 ND 13
Docket No.: 20120213
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The district court is required to follow pronouncements of an appellate court on legal issues in subsequent proceedings of the case and to carry the appellate court's mandate into effect according to its terms.

Sateren v. Sateren 2013 ND 12
Docket No.: 20120192
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Generally, individuals that unconditionally, voluntarily, and consciously accept a substantial benefit from a divorce judgment waive the right to appeal the judgment.
The appellate court must be able to understand the basis for the district court's decision.
Violations of interim provisions affecting marital property before entry of final judgments in divorce cases are not condoned.

Interest of J.M. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2013 ND 11
Docket No.: 20120253
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in deciding whether a proffered expert witness's testimony will assist the trier of fact and in evaluating whether there is an adequate factual basis for the expert's opinion.

Coppage v. State 2013 ND 10
Docket No.: 20120267
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: N.D.R.Ev. 609 governs the admission of evidence of certain criminal convictions for the purpose of attacking a witness's general character for truthfulness. Rule 609 does not apply to the admission of evidence of a prior conviction for purposes of impeachment by contradiction.
Evidence that is otherwise inadmissible, may be admitted if the opposing party opens the door through his testimony and invites any error.
A district court is required to follow the pronouncement of any appellate court on legal issues in subsequent proceedings and to carry out the appellate court's mandate according to its terms.

Sweeney v. Kirby 2013 ND 9
Docket No.: 20120339
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A party seeking to modify primary residential responsibility who provides competent evidence demonstrating a prima facie case for modification is entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

State v. Chacano 2013 ND 8
Docket No.: 20120187
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A failure to make a proper trial objection to evidence prevents a defendant from arguing on appeal the trial court erred in admitting the evidence.
A prosecutor errs by arguing to the jury the defendant's testimony is a lie.
A defendant must establish his substantial rights were affected by a prosecutor's improper argument for the conviction to be reversed.

Pederson v. State 2013 ND 7
Docket No.: 20120331
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Chase 2013 ND 6
Docket No.: 20120332
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of continuous sexual abuse of a child summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Poitra v. State (cross-reference w/20090339) 2013 ND 5
Docket No.: 20120283
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Vetter 2013 ND 4
Docket No.: 20120015
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A vehicle may be found to be a dangerous weapon under N.D.C.C. 12.1-01-04(6).

Adoption of D.J.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2013 ND 3
Docket No.: 20120278
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Adoption
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Civil judgment denying an applicant's petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Holkesvig v. Moore (Cross-reference w/20110007) 2013 ND 2
Docket No.: 20120356
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court order denying a motion to vacate judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (7).

Holkesvig v. State (Consolidated w/20120334) 2013 ND 1
Docket No.: 20120333
Filing Date: 1/23/2013
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court judgment summarily dismissing petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

State v. Baesler (consolidated w/20120296) 2012 ND 262
Docket No.: 20120295
Filing Date: 12/24/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia convictions are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross-ref. w/20080082 & 20100058) 2012 ND 261
Docket No.: 20120158
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: When a person committed as a sexually dangerous individual petitions for discharge, the State has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the committed individual remains a sexually dangerous individual.
A motion for a continuance may be granted for good cause.

Nuveen v. Nuveen (cross-reference w/20100134 & 20120080) 2012 ND 260
Docket No.: 20120246
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: When considering an upward deviation in child support a court does not need to find specific needs that the children lack to justify a deviation.
A district court does not err by offsetting child support obligations before making a deviation.

Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins., et al. 2012 ND 259
Docket No.: 20120195
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The statutory rules for interpreting indemnity contracts are included in every indemnity contract unless a contrary intention appears in the contract.
An indemnity contract does not have to specifically state that the statutory provisions do not apply for a contrary intent to appear in the contract.

Howard, et al. v. Trotter, et al. 2012 ND 258
Docket No.: 20120221
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Congressional section lines are open for public travel without the necessity of any governmental action.
If a county commission orders a public highway to be established along a congressional section line, it is necessary only to establish a public highway where deviations from the section line occur.
Uncertainty as to the amount of damages does not preclude recovery. Damages may be awarded if a reasonable basis for computing the approximate amount is provided.

MayPort Farmers Co-Op v. St. Hilaire Seed Company, Inc. 2012 ND 257
Docket No.: 20120202
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Debtor/Creditor
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Conflicts in the evidence will not be reweighed, and credibility of witnesses will not be reassessed on appeal.
A district court's decision on a motion to amend judgment will not be reversed on appeal unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.

Interest of J.N. (Confidential) (consolidated with 20120390) 2012 ND 256
Docket No.: 20120389
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A specific finding that the child is currently deprived is a necessary prerequisite to termination of parental rights under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c).
An appellate court cannot properly review a decision if the trial court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision.

Lund v. Lund, et al. 2012 ND 255
Docket No.: 20120210
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The phrase "transacting any business in this state" in the long-arm jurisdiction provision under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2)(A) must be given a broad, expansive interpretation.
Contacts sufficient to support personal jurisdiction under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2) need not be current but may arise from past conduct, and personal jurisdiction may be exercised over a former resident for claims arising from activities she engaged in while previously residing in the state.

Interest of T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross reference with 20110084) 2012 ND 254
Docket No.: 20120168
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Unless a statute imposing a time limit declares that the time limit is jurisdictional, the time limit will not be treated as affecting the jurisdiction of a court or administrative agency.
Whether a child remains deprived is a finding of fact which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.

D.E. v. K.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2012 ND 253
Docket No.: 20120069
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A presumption of paternity arises when a man is married to the mother of a child and the child is born during the marriage.
Only a person for whose benefit a statute of limitations inures or someone standing in that person's place may take advantage of the statute. A statute of limitations defense may not be asserted by one party on behalf of another person.
In proceedings to adjudicate parentage, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent a minor or incapacitated child if the child is a party or if the court finds that the interests of the child are not adequately represented.

State v. Benefiel (Consolidated w/20120275) 2012 ND 252
Docket No.: 20120274
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Two district court orders revoking a defendant's probation and resentencing him to five years' imprisonment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

State v. Wolfgram 2012 ND 251
Docket No.: 20120286
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment sentencing defendant to imprisonment within statutory range summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Interest of Voisine (Cross-reference w/20090182 & 20100163) 2012 ND 250
Docket No.: 20120325
Filing Date: 12/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Disciplinary Board v. McCray 2012 ND 249
Docket No.: 20120363
Filing Date: 12/3/2012
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author:

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Deyle v. Deyle 2012 ND 248
Docket No.: 20120157
Filing Date: 11/30/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: District courts must look both forward and backward when making primary residential responsibility findings under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(d) after factor (d) was amended in 2009.
A district court's denial of attorney fees or interim child support must be explained.
A district court's denial of extended summer parenting time between a non-custodial parent and a child of sufficient age must be explained.

State v. Herzig 2012 ND 247
Docket No.: 20110304
Filing Date: 11/28/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: When a legitimate dispute exists as to whether a road is a public road by prescription, resolution should take place civilly and not in a criminal trespass action.

Ehlen v. Melvin, et al. 2012 ND 246
Docket No.: 20120233
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: For the existence of a contract, the parties must consent to the agreement, and consent is not mutual unless the parties all agree upon the same thing in the same sense.
The acceptance of a contract must be absolute and unqualified, and a qualified acceptance is a counteroffer.

Niska v. Falconer 2012 ND 245
Docket No.: 20120252
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court's finding of domestic violence may be based on actual harm, or the infliction of fear of imminent harm.
A district court's finding of domestic violence must be adequate to understand the basis for its decision.

Muldoon v. WSI, et al. 2012 ND 244
Docket No.: 20120273
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Conflicting testimony will not be reweighed and credibility of witnesses will not be reassessed on appeal.
Willful conduct is conduct engaged in intentionally and not inadvertently. Such a state of mind can rarely be proven directly and must usually be inferred from conduct and circumstantial evidence.
An issue not properly raised before the trial court cannot be brought for the first time on appeal.

State v. Dominguez 2012 ND 243
Docket No.: 20120240
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A trial court may not grant a new trial on its own motion and may act only upon a timely motion made by the defendant.
An order entered by a trial court without jurisdiction is void and may be vacated by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the merits of an appeal from an order denying an untimely motion for a new trial.

State, ex rel. Madden v. Rustad, et al. 2012 ND 242
Docket No.: 20120305
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Criminal - Writ of Supervision
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Under the Confrontation Clause, an accused is entitled to confront witnesses who make testimonial statements in analytical reports.

Haag v. State 2012 ND 241
Docket No.: 20120196
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The Board of Pharmacy has authority to adopt administrative rules designating prohibited controlled substances, and upon becoming effective, a final administrative rule designating a prohibited controlled substance has the force and effect of law.

State v. Tresenriter (Consolidated w/20120027-20120049 & 20120057) 2012 ND 240
Docket No.: 20120026
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A party who fails to object at trial to admission of offered evidence waives the objection and may not on appeal challenge admission of the evidence.
A defendant alleging obvious error has the burden to demonstrate plain error that affected his substantial rights, and the error must be a clear deviation from an applicable legal rule under current law.

Schwab v. Zajac 2012 ND 239
Docket No.: 20120172
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A party who voluntarily pays a judgment waives the right to appeal from the judgment.
Evidence of settlement negotiations is not admissible to prove liability for a claim that is disputed as to either the validity or the amount.
Error may not be predicated upon an exclusion of evidence unless a substantial right is affected and the substance of the evidence was made known to the trial court in an offer of proof.
A self-represented litigant is held to the same procedural rules as a litigant represented by counsel.
A plaintiff in a quiet title action involving a slander of title claim is entitled to attorney fees on appeal in defending a favorable judgment.

Holkesvig v. Welte (cons. w/20120204-205) (cross-ref listed in memo screen) 2012 ND 236
Docket No.: 20120203
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court judgment finding plaintiff in contempt is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4).

Interest of A.J.L.H. (Confidential) (consolidated w/20120383-20120385) 2012 ND 235
Docket No.: 20120382
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Juvenile court judgment terminating a mother's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Keita v. Keita 2012 ND 234
Docket No.: 20110252
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Parenting time with a noncustodial parent may be curtailed or eliminated entirely if it is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health. A restriction on parenting time must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence and accompanied by a detailed demonstration of the physical or emotional harm likely to result from visitation.
An award of supervised parenting time based on a finding that a party is a flight risk must be supported by specific evidence that the parent has an intent to abscond or flee with the child or that the parent has hindered the other parent's custody of the child.
A district court errs in reserving jurisdiction to award spousal support only to ensure future compliance with its property division and attorney fees award.

Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20100230) 2012 ND 233
Docket No.: 20120175
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Waslaski v. State (consolidated w/ 20120292 & 20120293, cross reference in memo) 2012 ND 232
Docket No.: 20120291
Filing Date: 11/27/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Jordet, et al. v. Jordet 2012 ND 231
Docket No.: 20120185
Filing Date: 11/5/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The equitable remedy of setoff will be exercised to promote substantial justice and rests largely in the sound discretion of the district court.
Generally, a person who has been denied one remedy by a court is not prohibited from pursuing other available remedies.

State v. Jirinzu 2012 ND 230
Docket No.: 20120247
Filing Date: 10/25/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Theft
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court criminal judgment revoking David Jirinzu's probation and sentencing him to eighteen months of imprisonment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Kirkpatrick 2012 ND 229
Docket No.: 20110312
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A criminal information needs to be sufficient enough to provide a defendant notice of the charge against him, to enable him to prepare a defense, and to plead the result in bar of a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.
Extreme emotional disturbance is a mitigating factor, and its application becomes attenuated as the amount of time between its triggering event and the crime increases.

Fonder v. Fonder 2012 ND 228
Docket No.: 20120134
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Krueger v. Tran 2012 ND 227
Docket No.: 20120152
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: In modification of primary residential responsibility cases, a material change in circumstances can exist when one parent attempts to alienate a child's affection for the other parent, when parents are openly hostile towards each other and that hostility negatively affects the child, or when the noncustodial parent's situation improves accompanied by a general decline in the child's condition with the other parent over the same time period.
Methods other than a change of residential responsibility should be used initially to attempt to remedy a parent's misbehavior, but, after exhausting other remedies, a change may be the only method to correct the damage of a particularly stubborn and defiant custodial parent.

Herring, et al. v. Lisbon Partners, et al. 2012 ND 226
Docket No.: 20120090
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The owner of a tree's trunk owns the entire tree, including branches and roots which encroach upon adjoining property.
The owner of a tree whose branches or roots encroach upon neighboring property may be liable when the encroaching branches or roots cause damage, or create imminent danger of causing damage, beyond merely casting shade or dropping leaves, flowers, or fruit.
A neighboring landowner may engage in self-help and cut back encroaching branches or roots to the property line.

Hammeren v. Hammeren 2012 ND 225
Docket No.: 20110345
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The district court must award primary residential responsibility to the parent who will better promote the child's best interests, and the court must consider all the relevant statutory best-interest factors. Although a separate finding is not required for each statutory factor, the court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the custody decision.
The preference of a child who is capable of intelligently choosing between his parents for custody can be significant in determining the best interest of the child, but the child's preference is only one factor to consider and is not usually determinative.
Although rotating residential responsibility is not per se erroneous, a court's findings must support the conclusion such alternating custody is in the child's best interests.
A district court's decision on a motion to amend or make additional findings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(b), on a motion to alter or amend a judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(j), or on a motion for relief from the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b), will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.

Disciplinary Board v. McDonagh (Consolidated w/ 20120238) 2012 ND 224
Docket No.: 20120237
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer disbarment ordered.

Gardner v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation 2012 ND 223
Docket No.: 20120230
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Whether an officer failed to give an implied consent advisory is not an issue for the administrative hearing for the suspension of the individual's driver's license.
An individual may be deemed to have refused chemical testing for blood alcohol content when the individual repeatedly refuses to cooperate with police after chemical testing is requested.

Shannon v. Shannon 2012 ND 222
Docket No.: 20110340
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A judgment which does not adjudicate all claims of all of the parties is interlocutory and nonappealable unless the district court expressly certifies the judgment is final under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b).
A judgment or order that resolves only part of a single claim may not be certified as final under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b).

Zaiser v. Jaeger 2012 ND 221
Docket No.: 20120346
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Prohibition
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The Secretary of State may not count elector signatures on initiative petitions accompanied by circulator affidavits that falsely swear each elector signature was executed in circulator's presence and each elector signature is the genuine signature of the individual whose name it purports to be.

Moseng v. Frey, et al. 2012 ND 220
Docket No.: 20120226
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A plaintiff cannot recover damages for emotional distress resulting from an affair between the plaintiff's spouse and a third party.

Wenco v. EOG Resources, Inc., et al. 2012 ND 219
Docket No.: 20120194
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: If a mineral owner who owns a mineral interest subject to an outstanding royalty interest executes a mineral deed with a warranty clause to a party conveying mineral acres or interests in oil, gas and other minerals in and under without any reference to the outstanding royalty interest, the retained mineral interest of the mineral owner alone bears the outstanding royalty if the interest is large enough to satisfy the royalty interest.
Decisions are pronounced by a majority of the Supreme Court.
Although the existence or absence of waiver is generally a question of fact, the issue becomes a question of law if reasonable persons could draw only one conclusion from the circumstances.

Evenson v. Evenson (cross reference w/20060148 & 20080112) 2012 ND 218
Docket No.: 20120182
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify spousal support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Bishop v. WSI, et al. 2012 ND 217
Docket No.: 20120138
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate if it meets the requirements of N.D.C.C. ch. 65-05.1 and gives the injured worker a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment.
Because the legislature intended for injured workers to be provided with actual rehabilitation with a realistic opportunity to return to work, and not merely a theoretical rehabilitation on paper only, WSI must consider all of the injured worker's functional limitations when determining whether the employment options identified in the rehabilitation plan present a realistic opportunity for substantial gainful employment.

State of N.D., et al. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve Fund 2012 ND 216
Docket No.: 20110368
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The statutory procedure authorizing a proceeding to enforce an administrative subpoena in district court, is a special proceeding, and an order denying an application for enforcement of an administrative subpoena is appealable.
The particular controls general rule of statutory construction applies only when the conflict between two statutory provisions is irreconcilable.
The Department of Human Services was statutorily authorized to issue an administrative subpoena to the North Dakota Insurance Reserve Fund seeking information relevant to child support enforcement.

Corman v. State 2012 ND 215
Docket No.: 20120307
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief application summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Stridiron v. State (cross-reference w/20080285) 2012 ND 214
Docket No.: 20120159
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

State v. Jones 2012 ND 213
Docket No.: 20120165
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment for forgery entered upon a guilty plea summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Interest of T.M. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20120117) 2012 ND 212
Docket No.: 20120116
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order finding juvenile committed disorderly conduct and is a deprived child, and placing him in custody of Social Services for one year with authority to remove him from mother's home, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Corman v. State 2012 ND 211
Docket No.: 20120309
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief application summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

State v. Anaya-Verajerano 2012 ND 210
Docket No.: 20120268
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Smith 2012 ND 209
Docket No.: 20120234
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Holkesvig v. Grove (consol. w/ 20120225) 2012 ND 208
Docket No.: 20120169
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Summary judgment dismissing claims alleging misconduct by a law enforcement officer and orders denying post-judgment motions and prohibiting the plaintiff from filing further motions or pleadings is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

State v. McGeehan 2012 ND 207
Docket No.: 20120164
Filing Date: 10/23/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal judgment after a jury found a defendant guilty of simple assault on a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Disciplinary Board v. Hankey 2012 ND 206
Docket No.: 20120304
Filing Date: 10/15/2012
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded.

Disciplinary Board v. Summers 2012 ND 205
Docket No.: 20120317
Filing Date: 10/1/2012
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Walstad v. Walstad 2012 ND 204
Docket No.: 20120059
Filing Date: 10/1/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Punitive damages are not authorized in an independent action in equity challenging a prior divorce judgment.