Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3721 - 3730 of 12418 results
Evenson v. Evenson (cross reference w/20060148 & 20080112)
2012 ND 218 Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify spousal support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Bishop v. WSI, et al.
2012 ND 217
Highlight: A vocational rehabilitation plan is appropriate if it meets the requirements of N.D.C.C. ch. 65-05.1 and gives the injured worker a reasonable opportunity to obtain substantial gainful employment. |
State of N.D., et al. v. N.D. Insurance Reserve Fund
2012 ND 216
Highlight: The statutory procedure authorizing a proceeding to enforce an administrative subpoena in district court, is a special proceeding, and an order denying an application for enforcement of an administrative subpoena is appealable. |
Corman v. State
2012 ND 215 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief application summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Stridiron v. State (cross-reference w/20080285)
2012 ND 214 Highlight: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
State v. Jones
2012 ND 213 Highlight: Criminal judgment for forgery entered upon a guilty plea summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Interest of T.M. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20120117)
2012 ND 212 Highlight: Order finding juvenile committed disorderly conduct and is a deprived child, and placing him in custody of Social Services for one year with authority to remove him from mother's home, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Corman v. State
2012 ND 211 Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief application summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Anaya-Verajerano
2012 ND 210 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Smith
2012 ND 209 Highlight: Criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |