Opinions

Tibor v. State 2012 ND 84
Docket No.: 20110313
Filing Date: 5/3/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6).

Harmon v. State (Cross-reference w/19960206 & 19970100) 2012 ND 83
Docket No.: 20110343
Filing Date: 5/3/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author:

Highlight: A district court order summarily dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Willard v. Allstate Ins. Co., et al. 2012 ND 82
Docket No.: 20110314
Filing Date: 4/18/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Summary judgment in a wrongful death action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

Tibert et al. v. Nodak Mutual 2012 ND 81
Docket No.: 20110143
Filing Date: 4/12/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Public policy precludes an insured from being indemnified for losses caused by the insured's intentional or willful conduct.
In determining whether coverage is barred by an intentional acts exclusion in an insurance policy or by the statutory prohibition against coverage for intentional or willful conduct, intent to cause the injury or damages can be inferred when the act was done intentionally and was of such a character that harmful consequences are substantially certain to result from the act.
A tortfeasor who acted in concert with another by agreeing to pursue a common plan to commit wrongful acts, with knowledge of the plan and its purpose, intended the harm and injury caused by the wrongful act.
A liability insurer has a duty to defend an underlying action against its insured if the allegations in the complaint give rise to potential liability or the possibility of coverage under the policy, and any doubt about whether a duty to defend exists must be resolved in favor of the insured.

Hector v. City of Fargo 2012 ND 80
Docket No.: 20110187
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A resolution of necessity for an improvement district must set forth the general nature of the improvement, the approximate amount the municipality will be obligated to pay, and the amount proposed to be paid by special assessments.
The resolution of necessity and engineer's report for a proposed improvement does not include the final costs of the project, and the actual amount specially assessed may exceed the amount proposed in the resolution and engineer's report.
A special assessment commission has broad discretion in choosing the method used to decide the benefit a property receives from an improvement and to apportion the costs to individual properties.

M.M., et al. v. Fargo Public School Dist. #1, et al.(cross-reference w/ 20090121 2012 ND 79
Docket No.: 20110260
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: When statutes are silent on an issue, courts may consider authorities from outside the state to resolve the issue.
A parent is not entitled to recover medical expenses paid on behalf of an injured minor child whose comparative fault exceeds the fault of the tortfeasor.

Northern Excavating v. Sisters of Mary of the Presentation 2012 ND 78
Docket No.: 20110209
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: When no amount is stated in a construction contract, the amount of a filed construction lien must be reasonably accurate for the lienholder to avoid liability for the owner's costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
Under N.D.C.C. 35-27-24.1, an owner who successfully contests the validity or accuracy of a construction lien is entitled to all attorney's fees and costs associated with the lien contest.
Determination of who is a prevailing party is based upon success on the merits, not damages.

Schock v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2012 ND 77
Docket No.: 20110254
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Common sense and experience permit an administrative hearing officer to aid in drawing inferences from the evidence presented.
An administrative hearing officer may take official notice of daylight savings time.
The statute requiring a hearing officer to "immediately deliver to the person a copy of the decision," is not basic and mandatory.

State v. Alaniz 2012 ND 76
Docket No.: 20110259
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches applies to searches by school authorities, and the legality of the search depends on its reasonableness.
A search by a school official is reasonable if the search was justified at its inception and the search was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.
Generally, the reasonableness standard for school searches will apply when the search involves a school resource officer acting on his or her own initiative or at the direction of other school officials to further educationally related goals.

State v. Morin 2012 ND 75
Docket No.: 20110303
Filing Date: 4/10/2012
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A district court decision on a motion to suppress evidence will be affirmed if there is sufficient competent evidence to support the district court's findings and the decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.
When determining whether consent to a warrantless search was voluntary, the existence or absence of certain factors concerning the condition and characteristics of the individual at the time of consent and the details of the setting in which consent was obtained are significant, but no one factor is dispositive.