Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3921 - 3930 of 12118 results
|
State v. Thompson (Consolidated w/20100176)
2011 ND 11 Highlight: A person has been 'seized' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave. |
|
Guardianship/Conservatorship of G.L.
2011 ND 10
Highlight: A party may not collaterally attack a prior unappealed order in a subsequent proceeding. |
|
Matter of T.O. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20090181)
2011 ND 9 Highlight: A district court reviewing the civil commitment of a sexually dangerous individual must make sufficient factual findings to provide the appellate court with the basis for the court's decision. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Kirschner (Consolidated w/ 20100251)
2011 ND 8
Highlight: Personal matters do not justify or excuse an attorney's misconduct but are mitigating factors that may reduce a disciplinary sanction. |
|
Investors Title Insurance Co. v. Herzig, et al.
2011 ND 7
Highlight: Although a district court generally loses jurisdiction when a notice of appeal is filed, an appeal does not stay proceedings for the enforcement of a judgment. |
|
State v. Martin
2011 ND 6
Highlight: In interpreting a statute, the word "or" is generally disjunctive in nature and indicates an alternative between different things and actions. The literal meaning of the word "or" will apply unless it renders the statute inoperable or its meaning becomes questionable. |
|
State v. Golden (Cross-reference w/20080301)
2011 ND 5 Highlight: Conviction for class C felony reckless endangerment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Berg v. Wysocki
2011 ND 4 Highlight: A judgment granting primary residential responsibility of a child to one parent, and parenting time to the other, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
|
State v. Pelzl
2011 ND 3 Highlight: Judgment revoking probation summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4), and (7). |
|
State v. Ames
2011 ND 2 Highlight: Order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |