Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3971 - 3980 of 12418 results
Coffman v. State
2011 ND 209 Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Matter of L.D.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)(Cross-reference 20040319, 20060360 & 20100137)
2011 ND 208
Highlight: Order continuing commitment as a sexually dangerous individual summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Tarnavsky v. Tschider (Cross-reference w/20090348)
2011 ND 207 Highlight: Order denying motion for relief from judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (4), and double costs, and nominal attorney fees of $500, are awarded to the appellee for defending a frivolous appeal. |
Peterson v. Sando
2011 ND 206
Highlight: Judicial estoppel applies only where a party's subsequent position is totally inconsistent with its original position. |
Alerus Financial v. Marcil Group, et al.
2011 ND 205
Highlight: Guarantors of commercial real estate loans are not afforded the protections of the anti-deficiency judgment statutes. |
Gottus v. Job Service North Dakota
2011 ND 204
Highlight: An employee's repeated failure to perform job responsibilities competently, after demonstrating the ability to do so, may rise to the level of misconduct. |
State v. Mackey
2011 ND 203 Highlight: When a court imposes an illegal sentence and subsequently corrects that sentence, a defendant is not entitled to withdraw his plea under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35, and a manifest injustice does not exist to allow a defendant to withdraw his plea under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(d). |
Sall v. Sall
2011 ND 202
Highlight: To warrant a remedial sanction for contempt of court, there must be a willful and inexcusable intent to violate a court order. |
Wong v. State (cross-reference 20100171)
2011 ND 201
Highlight: To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the petitioner must overcome the strong presumption that an attorney's representation is reasonable. |
State v. Nickel (Consolidated w/20100411 & 20100412)
2011 ND 200 Highlight: Whether an administrative agency has substantially complied with emergency rulemaking requirements is a question of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. |