Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4031 - 4040 of 12359 results
|
Locken v. Locken, et al.
2011 ND 90 Highlight: Under the statute of limitations to cancel or enforce a contract for deed, the due date of the last payment on the indebtedness secured by the contract for deed means the record date the contract for deed was satisfied. |
|
Interest of T.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2011 ND 89 Highlight: Juvenile court referee's order and juvenile court's order are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Kinsella
2011 ND 88 Highlight: A defendant who does not stand on his motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the prosecution's case in chief, but chooses to introduce evidence in his defense, allows a reviewing court to examine the evidence as a whole, including the evidence offered by the defendant. |
|
First International Bank & Trust v. Peterson, et al.
2011 ND 87
Highlight: In an action for declaratory, injunctive, or other prospective relief, an association may have associational standing to bring a suit on behalf of its members if: (1) its members have standing to sue in their own right; (2) the interests the association seeks to protect are germane to the organization's purpose; and (3) neither the claim asserted nor the relief requested require the participation of individual members in the lawsuit. |
|
Citibank (South Dakota) v. Peterson
2011 ND 86
Highlight: Rule 60(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., gives courts discretion to provide relief from judgments; however, this power is not provided in order to relieve a party from free, calculated and deliberate choices he has made. |
|
State v. Duncan
2011 ND 85
Highlight: When a defendant does not object to alleged prosecutorial misconduct at trial, the Court's review is limited to determining whether the prosecutor's conduct prejudicially affected defendant's substantial rights, so as to deprive him of a fair trial. |
|
State v. Zottnick
2011 ND 84 Highlight: A defendant may be entitled to a jury instruction on excuse and his conduct may be excused if there is evidence that the defendant believes the facts are such that conduct is necessary and appropriate for any of the purposes which would establish a justification or excuse under the criminal code, even though the defendant's believe is mistaken. |
|
A.R. Audit Services, Inc. v. Ulledahl
2011 ND 83 Highlight: Summary judgment awarding amount owed for medical services is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
State v. Erhart
2011 ND 82 Highlight: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
State v. Beane (Consolidated w/20100341)
2011 ND 81 Highlight: Criminal judgments for possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |