Opinions

Yellow Book Sales v. Bolinske Partnership, et al. 2011 ND 43
Docket No.: 20100283
Filing Date: 3/22/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: District court order and judgment in a contract case summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

State v. Klein 2011 ND 42
Docket No.: 20100261
Filing Date: 3/22/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), and a criminal judgment sentencing a defendant as a dangerous special offender is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Deng 2011 ND 41
Docket No.: 20100247
Filing Date: 3/22/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author:

Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Disciplinary Board v. Delorme 2011 ND 40
Docket No.: 20100414
Filing Date: 3/17/2011
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered.

Vicknair, et al. v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc., et al. 2011 ND 39
Docket No.: 20100029
Filing Date: 2/18/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: When a statute is derived from a uniform act it must be construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the laws of those states which enact it.
A party seeking application of the "escape clause" in N.D.C.C. 28-01.2-04, which provides an exception to the general rule that the statute of limitations of the state whose substantive law governs the case should be applied, bears the burden of proving the escape clause applies.
A party who responds to a motion for summary judgment by requesting additional time for discovery under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56(f) must identify with specificity the particular information sought and explain how that information would preclude summary judgment and why it has not previously been obtained.

Brown v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., et al. 2011 ND 38
Docket No.: 20100220
Filing Date: 2/14/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A municipality may enact ordinances allowing it to terminate a resident's services due to nonpayment for services.
A utility company may combine balances from a customer's separate accounts and terminate services if the combined balance remains unpaid, as long as the balances are from services of the same class and for the same customer.
A customer has received personal notice by delivery, as required by regulations, when it is evident on the record the customer was aware of an unpaid utility balance and the utility company's intent to disconnect services.

Hildenbrand v. Capital RV Center, Inc. 2011 ND 37
Docket No.: 20100118
Filing Date: 2/11/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The law of the case doctrine and the scope of the parties' appeal define the parameters of appellate review.
A district court has broad discretion over the nature and scope of written questions submitted to the jury.
Contract provisions may establish entitlement to possession for conversion purposes.
The invocation of the shorthand expression "meeting of the minds" is more misleading than helpful in deciding contract issues.
A failure to explicitly request specific equitable relief is not fatal to a court's grant of equitable relief.

Sorenson v. Alinder, et al. 2011 ND 36
Docket No.: 20100254
Filing Date: 2/8/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Under North Dakota's abandoned mineral statutes, the requirement of mailing a notice of lapse under N.D.C.C. 38-18.1-06(2) requires a "reasonable inquiry" only when the mineral owner's address does not appear of record.

Eaton v. State 2011 ND 35
Docket No.: 20100235
Filing Date: 2/8/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The sufficiency of the factual basis to support a guilty plea is a question of law on appeal from a summary denial of an application of post-conviction relief, where the parties agree there were no disputed issues of fact.
Courts in post-conviction relief proceedings may consider information from the plea proceedings in addition to the factual basis presented to ensure there was a sufficient factual basis to support the guilty plea.
A court does not improperly infer an intent to deliver a controlled substance while establishing a factual basis to support a guilty plea, where the court relies on evidence of possession of a significant amount of the controlled substance and other items suggesting an intent to deliver.

Johnson, et al. v. Taliaferro, et al. 2011 ND 34
Docket No.: 20100314
Filing Date: 2/8/2011
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Subsequently enacted legislation cannot take away a vested right.