Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4201 - 4210 of 12382 results
Entzie v. Entzie
2010 ND 194
Highlight: In calculating a child support obligation, a district court must specifically find an obligor's tax returns are not an adequate reflection of income or are not a reliable indicator of future income before the court can refuse to consider tax return information. |
State v. Fischer
2010 ND 193 Highlight: Criminal judgment for assault on a peace officer and terrorizing summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Interest of D.V.A. (CONFIDENTIAL) (Cross-Ref w/20080319)
2010 ND 192 Highlight: Order continuing commitment as sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State v. Peltier
2010 ND 191 Highlight: Conviction on two counts of gross sexual imposition summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Matter of M.D. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2010 ND 190 Highlight: Civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Fehl-Haber v. State
2010 ND 189 Highlight: Judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Pankowski
2010 ND 188 Highlight: Conviction of possession with intent to manufacture or deliver a controlled substance (methamphetamine) and with intent to flee or attempt to elude a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Disciplinary Board v. Lucas
2010 ND 187 Highlight: Rule 4.2 of the North Dakota Rules of Professional Conduct, prohibiting attorneys from communicating with a represented party, applies to attorneys who are representing themselves. |
Sailer v. Sailer
2010 ND 185
Highlight: The substantive enforceability of a premarital agreement is a matter of law to be decided by the court. |
State v. Adams
2010 ND 184
Highlight: Those who voluntarily choose to live with probationers assume the risk that they, too, will have diminished Fourth Amendment rights in areas shared with the probationer. |