Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4271 - 4280 of 12358 results
Dutton v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
2010 ND 99
Highlight: A permanent partial impairment evaluation must be conducted by an independent, unbiased physician. |
Matter of Midgett (Cross-Ref w/20080255 & 20070109)
2010 ND 98 Highlight: Where the district court makes sufficiently detailed findings of fact, supported by the record, on whether a committed individual has serious difficulty controlling his behavior, the reviewing court will not reverse on that issue. |
City of Fargo v. Knodle
2010 ND 97 Highlight: Judgment entered after defendant was found guilty of driving while under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Disciplinary Board v. Wolff (Interim Suspension)
2010 ND 96 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Botner v. Bismarck Parks, et al.
2010 ND 95
Highlight: Whether the district court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law reviewed de novo on the entire record. |
Sonnenberg v. Sonnenberg
2010 ND 94
Highlight: When an obligor owes a duty of support to at least one obligee, as well as a duty of support to a child living with the obligor who is not also a child of that obligee, the child support guidelines require that the district court make an allowance for the child living with the obligor. |
Estate of Loomer (cross ref. w/20070018)
2010 ND 93
Highlight: Partition is an equitable remedy governed by equitable principles, and district courts have wide judicial discretion in partition actions to do equity and to make a fair and just division of the property or proceeds between the parties. |
Skogen, et al. v. Hemen Township Board, et al.
2010 ND 92
Highlight: A township has a mandatory duty to construct or reconstruct a township road in a manner that does not obstruct the natural flow and drainage of surface waters in accordance with the stream crossing standards prepared by the department of transportation and the state engineer. |
Stenehjem, ex rel. v. Crosslands, Inc.
2010 ND 91
Highlight: For the purposes of the corporate farming law, "the land in question" refers to the entire tract purchased and requires the court to view the property as a single tract. |
State v. Moe
2010 ND 90 Highlight: The standard for reconciling a jury verdict is whether the verdict is legally inconsistent. Verdicts are not legally inconsistent when they can legally coexist and when the jury's findings are not clearly contrary to the evidence. |