Opinions

Zimmerman v. WSI, et al. 2010 ND 42
Docket No.: 20090243
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: An injured worker may be entitled to temporary partial disability benefits for a cumulative total of five years.

Dunn v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2010 ND 41
Docket No.: 20090317
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Judicial estoppel prohibits a party from taking inconsistent or contradictory positions during litigation.
Administrative due process requires a fair hearing before a fair tribunal. The fact-finder in an administrative hearing cannot prejudge the case, harbor a bias against a party, or participate in the hearing if there is a high probability of bias against a party.
A district court acting in an appellate capacity has authority under the Administrative Agencies Practice Act to dispose of procedural matters as reasonably required, including the ability to vacate a judgment entered on the basis of a procedural mistake.

McAllister v. McAllister, et al. 2010 ND 40
Docket No.: 20090176
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Granting visitation to a third party is a lesser intrusion on a parent's constitutional right to the custody and companionship of his or her children than granting decisionmaking responsibility and primary residential responsibility to a third party.
A district court may recognize that it is not necessary to award primary residential responsibility to the psychological parent rather than the natural parent to prevent serious harm or detriment to the child and to also recognize that it is necessary to award visitation to the psychological parent to prevent serious harm or detriment to the child.

State v. Dudley 2010 ND 39
Docket No.: 20090293
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment, a law enforcement officer may search a vehicle without a warrant if the officer has probable cause.
A law enforcement officer has probable cause to search a vehicle if, based upon the facts and circumstances known to the officer, he or she reasonably believes the vehicle contains items subject to seizure.

Tweed v. State 2010 ND 38
Docket No.: 20090171
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: To obtain post-conviction relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence, the petitioner must demonstrate (1) the evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to learn about the evidence at the time of trial was not the result of a lack of diligence; (3) the newly discovered evidence is material to issues at trial; and (4) the weight and quality of the evidence would likely result in an acquittal.
To obtain post-conviction relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must demonstrate (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the petitioner was so prejudiced by counsel representation that, but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.

Oie v. State 2010 ND 37
Docket No.: 20090365
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

State v. Henrickson 2010 ND 36
Docket No.: 20090229
Filing Date: 3/16/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of escape is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

Parisien v. Parisien 2010 ND 35
Docket No.: 20090086
Filing Date: 3/5/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court may award spousal support to a party in a divorce action for any period of time. Spousal support determinations are findings of fact and will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous.
Spousal support awards must be made in consideration of the needs of the spouse seeking support and of the supporting spouse's needs and ability to pay.
A greater property distribution does not necessarily eliminate the need for spousal support.

Davis v. Enget, et al. 2010 ND 34
Docket No.: 20090329
Filing Date: 2/22/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: In legal malpractice claims, expert testimony is generally required to establish the applicable standard of care and whether an attorney's conduct fell below that standard.
New evidence cannot be tendered at oral arguments because it would be fundamentally unfair to fault a trial court's decision on the basis of evidence the trial court did not have the opportunity to consider.

Wolt v. Wolt (cross ref. 20090103) 2010 ND 33
Docket No.: 20090126
Filing Date: 2/22/2010
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court's finding of domestic violence is a finding of fact that will not be overturned unless it is clearly erroneous. A domestic violence protection order petitioner must prove "actual or imminent domestic violence" by a preponderance of the evidence.
"Domestic violence" includes physical harm, bodily injury, sexual activity compelled by physical force, assault, or the infliction of fear of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, sexual activity compelled by physical force, or assault, not committed in self-defense, on the complaining family or household members.
When the type of domestic violence justifying a domestic violence protection order is based upon fear, the harm feared by the petitioner must be "actual or imminent."
Even when a disorderly conduct restraining order has previously been entered and remains in effect, the doctrine of res judicata does not bar the subsequent entry of a domestic violence protection order.