Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4381 - 4390 of 12137 results
|
Bragg, et al. v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.
2009 ND 33 Highlight: An entity taking an interest in real property subject to a lis pendens--a written notice of a pending suit involving real property--is bound by all proceedings taken after the filing of the notice of lis pendens to the same extent as if that entity were a party to the underlying action, including a settlement of the underlying action. |
|
Gunia v. Gunia
2009 ND 32
Highlight: A party seeking to modify a child support obligation within one year of the decision setting the obligation must show a material change in circumstances. |
|
Koropatnicki v. State
2009 ND 31 Highlight: Order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Steen (Consolidated w/20080244 thru 20080247)
2009 ND 30 Highlight: A district court order denying defendant's motions for credit for time spent in custody is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Delzer, et al. v. Anderson
2009 ND 29 Highlight: Civil money judgment relating to assigned divorce debt summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). |
|
State v. Isom (Consolidated w/20080311-20080314)
2009 ND 28 Highlight: The district court's order denying defendant's motion for credit for time served is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Reciprocal Discipline of Swensen
2009 ND 27 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
|
Reciprocal Discipline of Hellerud
2009 ND 26 Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered. |
|
Interest of R.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2009 ND 25 Highlight: Mental health commitment and involuntary medication order summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
|
Collection Specialist Int'l v. McLaughlin Const. Co. (Cons. w/20080242)
2009 ND 24 Highlight: District court judgment in favor of McLaughlin Construction Co. in a contract case is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |