Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4481 - 4490 of 12428 results
|
LaRocque v. State
2009 ND 170 Highlight: District court order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R. App. P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
State v. Witzke
2009 ND 169 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
|
State v. Adams
2009 ND 168
Highlight: The right of appeal is governed by statute, and if there is no statutory basis for an appeal, the lack of jurisdiction will be noted and the appeal dismissed. |
|
State v. Johnson
2009 ND 167
Highlight: If a person ambiguously responds to a request to submit to a chemical test, the person suffers the consequences of that ambiguity. |
|
Kambeitz, et al. v. Acuity Ins. Co.
2009 ND 166
Highlight: Although the failure to plead an affirmative defense generally results in waiver of the defense, amendments to the pleadings are to be freely given when justice so requires. |
|
State v. Vandehoven
2009 ND 165
Highlight: The purpose of N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1) is to ensure the defendant understands the constitutional rights which are waived by entry of a guilty plea, to ensure a knowing and intelligent waiver of the right to counsel, and to ensure the defendant understands the maximum possible punishment and any applicable mandatory minimum punishment so he can make a knowing and intelligent decision whether to plead guilty. |
|
Tweeten v. Tweeten
2009 ND 164 Highlight: A husband and wife's decision to transfer separately owned property to themselves, as husband and wife, as joint tenants is a significant legal act, which may make a premarital agreement governing the distribution of that property inapplicable. |
|
State v. Schmeets
2009 ND 163 Highlight: To admit evidence of a defendant's prior convictions to establish an object is drug paraphernalia, a court must balance whether the probative value of the evidence outweighs the unfair prejudice to the defendant. |
|
Wells Fargo Bank v. Horob, et al.
2009 ND 161 Highlight: District court order declaring a default judgment entered by a Nebraska court is entitled to full faith and credit and enforceable in this state is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Interest of S.Z. (Confidential)
2009 ND 160 Highlight: Orders requiring treatment and medication at the North Dakota State Hospital summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |