Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4661 - 4670 of 12446 results
State v. Vick
2009 ND 6 Highlight: The district court's second amended judgment denying defendant's motion for additional credit for time spent in custody is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Geray v. Bertsch
2009 ND 5 Highlight: The district court's memorandum opinion and order denying defendant's motion to vacate is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), and plaintiff's request for attorney's fees on appeal is denied under N.D.R.App.P. 38. |
Pribyl v. State
2009 ND 4 Highlight: Order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Huffling
2009 ND 3 Highlight: If a sentence imposed by a trial court is within the range authorized by statute, this Court does not have the power to review the discretion of the sentencing court. |
State v. Cahoon
2009 ND 2 Highlight: Judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Adoption of E.H.L. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2009 ND 1 Highlight: Judgment terminating father's parental rights and granting grandparents' petition to adopt the child is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Voigt v. State
2008 ND 236
Highlight: A party seeking to bring a claim against the State or its employees must strictly comply with the requirements of N.D.C.C. 32-12.2-04(1). |
Disciplinary Board v. Karlsen (Consolidated w/ 20080295)
2008 ND 235 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Clark v. State (Cross-reference w/20030238)
2008 ND 234
Highlight: The law does not require that an evidentiary hearing be held on an application for post-conviction relief when the parties do not request a hearing. |
Gustafson v. Gustafson
2008 ND 233
Highlight: When an award of spousal support is reversed, the party paying is entitled to restitution for any amount paid since entry of the district court judgment, unless it would be inequitable. |