Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4711 - 4720 of 12446 results
|
Clark v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al.
2008 ND 192 Highlight: If there is conflicting medical evidence presented in a case, some of it favorable and some unfavorable to a claimant, WSI must adequately explain its reason for disregarding the favorable evidence when it reaches a conclusion less favorable to the claimant. |
|
State ex rel. Dept. of Labor v. Riemers, et al.
2008 ND 191 Highlight: An unlicensed natural person cannot be an attorney for an artificial person, such as a limited liability company. Court documents signed by a non-attorney on behalf of a limited liability company are void. |
|
Estate of Samuelson
2008 ND 190
Highlight: When a person excludes an individual in his will, the individual is excluded from taking both under the will and under intestate succession, unless the person making the will expressly specifies to the contrary. |
|
Lord & Stevens, Inc., et al. v. 3D Printing, Inc., et al.
2008 ND 189
Highlight: Whether there is an express or implied contract between the parties is a question for the trier of fact. |
|
Schmidt v. Job Service, et al.
2008 ND 188
Highlight: For purposes of unemployment benefits, misconduct is conduct evincing a willful or wanton disregard of an employer's interests and is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of an employee, or in carelessness or negligence of such degree or recurrence as to manifest equal culpability, wrongful intent or evil design, or to show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer's interests or of the employee's duties and obligations to an employer. |
|
Ebach v. Ebach
2008 ND 187
Highlight: A party seeking to modify a spousal support obligation must prove there has been a material change in circumstances since the time of the initial decree or, if the initial support award has been modified, a change since the subsequent modification. |
|
State v. Wetzel
2008 ND 186
Highlight: Words of a statute are given their plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning. |
|
Matter of R.A.S. (Confidential)
2008 ND 185
Highlight: A court must make sufficient factual findings to provide the appellate court with the basis for the court's decision. |
|
Public Service Commission v. Minnesota Grain
2008 ND 184
Highlight: On legal questions, such as interpretation of a statute, an agency's decision is fully reviewable on appeal. |
|
Brown v. Brodell, et al.
2008 ND 183
Highlight: Findings of fact in cases involving the doctrine of acquiescence are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard. |