Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4781 - 4790 of 12446 results
State v. Huber (Consolidated w/20080059)
2008 ND 122 Highlight: Criminal judgments for DUI and DUS are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. Mastre
2008 ND 121 Highlight: A criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Mayer
2008 ND 120 Highlight: Conviction for possessing marijuana, methamphetamine, and drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. Schmeets (Consolidated w/20070361)
2008 ND 119 Highlight: Order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4), and remanded to correct clerical errors. |
Riemers, et al. v. State, et al.
2008 ND 118 Highlight: A district court judgment awarding attorney fees for a prior appeal is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Red River Wings, Inc. v. Hoot, Inc. (Consolidated w/20070088 & 20070089)
2008 ND 117
Highlight: Unambiguous contracts are particularly amenable to summary judgment. |
Baukol Builders v. County of Grand Forks
2008 ND 116
Highlight: A party cannot seek the benefits of a transaction under the law and thereafter challenge the validity of the transaction. |
Peterson v. Ziegler
2008 ND 115
Highlight: Generally, the time computation rules in N.D.R.Civ.P. 6 apply to an appeal from an administrative agency decision unless the provisions of the rule conflict with a governing statute. |
Burlington Northern v. Fail, et al.
2008 ND 114
Highlight: The area of land covered by the easement, servitude, or nonappurtenant restriction on the use of real property shall be properly described and shall set out the area of land covered by the interest in real property. |
Olson v. State
2008 ND 113
Highlight: A petitioner seeking post-conviction relief through DNA testing of evidence must present a prima facie case showing the evidence to be tested has been subject to a sufficient chain of custody. |