Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4801 - 4810 of 12446 results
Riemers v. State of North Dakota, et al.
2008 ND 101
Highlight: When the Supreme Court denies a petition to review a Court of Appeals decision, the decision becomes final and will not be differently determined on a subsequent appeal in the same case. |
Guardianship/Conservatorship of D.M.O. (cross-reference 20040235)
2008 ND 100
Highlight: The Supreme Court will dismiss an appeal when issues become moot or academic and there is no actual controversy left for our determination. |
Larson v. Hagerty, et al.
2008 ND 99 Highlight: A district court judgment dismissing a complaint which alleged that state officials had deprived the appellant access to the courts is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Reopelle v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2008 ND 98
Highlight: Unless otherwise provided, statutes in effect on the date of an injury govern a claimant's right to collect workers compensation benefits. |
Waldie v. Waldie
2008 ND 97
Highlight: A district court's decision regarding redistribution of marital property and debt is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard. |
State v. $33,000 U.S. Currency, et al.
2008 ND 96
Highlight: A district court's denial of a motion for relief from a default judgment will be reversed if the court abused its discretion. |
Riemers v. Mahar
2008 ND 95
Highlight: A public figure is prohibited from recovering damages for defamatory criticism unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the statements were made with actual malice. |
State v. Schwab (Consolidated w/20070277)
2008 ND 94 Highlight: Once a blood alcohol test report is admitted into evidence, a court abuses its discretion by refusing to permit a DUI defendant to examine the analyst who performed the chemical testing, if the analyst is present at court. |
State v. Curtis (cross ref. 20070250 & 20070333)
2008 ND 93
Highlight: A criminal conviction will be reversed for insufficient evidence only when, after viewing the evidence and all reasonable evidentiary inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict, no rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
Walberg v. Walberg, et al.
2008 ND 92
Highlight: Statutes are construed to harmonize them and avoid an unreasonable result or unjust consequence. |