Opinions

Interest of C.J., S.J., and K.W. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20070315) 2008 ND 81
Docket No.: 20070314
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author:

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

Ward, et al. v. Bullis, et al. 2008 ND 80
Docket No.: 20070188
Filing Date: 4/25/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An attorney may be liable for securities law violations if he is an agent who effects or attempts to effect the purchase or sale of securities, and he aids or participates in any way in the sale or contract for sale made in violation of the Securities Act.
Summary judgment is appropriate when either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and no dispute exists as to either the material facts or the inferences to be drawn from undisputed facts, or resolving the factual disputes would not alter the result.

Manske v. Workforce Safety and Insurance 2008 ND 79
Docket No.: 20070173
Filing Date: 4/23/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A worker's employment need not be the sole cause of injury to be compensable. It is sufficient if a work condition is a substantial contributing factor to the disease.
The fact that an employee may have physical conditions or personal habits which make him or her more prone to such an injury does not constitute a sufficient reason for denying a claim.

Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2008 ND 78
Docket No.: 20070099
Filing Date: 4/22/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Section 65-01-09, N.D.C.C., does not grant WSI a subrogation interest in an injured worker's legal malpractice claim against an attorney who committed malpractice in handling the injured worker's claim against a third-party tortfeasor.

Sandvick, et al. v. LaCrosse, et al. 2008 ND 77
Docket No.: 20070146
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The crucial elements of a partnership are (1) an intention to be partners, (2) co-ownership of the business, and (3) a profit motive.
For a business enterprise to constitute a joint venture, the following four elements must be present: (1) contribution by the parties of money, property, time, or skill in some common undertaking, but the contributions need not be equal or of the same nature; (2) a proprietary interest and right of mutual control over the engaged property; (3) an express or implied agreement for the sharing of profits, and usually, but not necessarily, of losses; and (4) an express or implied contract showing a joint venture was formed. There is, however, no fixed formula for identifying the joint venture relationship in all cases, and each case will depend upon its own unique facts.
Principles of partnership law apply to the joint venture relationship.
Joint venturers, like copartners, owe to one another, while the enterprise continues, the duty of the finest loyalty.

Disciplinary Board v. O'Donnell (Consolidated w/ 20080085) 2008 ND 76
Docket No.: 20080084
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer is suspended from the practice of law for two years, but the suspension is stayed for two years on conditions. Interim suspension is vacated.

Grosgebauer v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 75
Docket No.: 20070299
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Whether a driver affirmatively refused to submit to alcohol testing is a determination of fact that is significantly reliant on the credibility of witnesses.
To cure a refusal to submit to alcohol testing, the consent to submit to testing must be clearly articulated and meet other criteria.

Stockman Bank of Montana v. AGSCO, Inc., et al.(Cross Ref w/20060174) 2008 ND 74
Docket No.: 20070357
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Where a party is erroneously ordered to pay another, the party is entitled to interest at the legal rate set by N.D.C.C. 47-14-05, when the judgment is later reversed.

State v. Jacobson 2008 ND 73
Docket No.: 20070103
Filing Date: 4/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An appearance of partiality requiring a judge's disqualification does not automatically result from a judge's casual or social acquaintance with a witness.
A disqualified judge whose withdrawal from a case is not mandatory has the option of either withdrawing or disclosing to the parties on the record the basis for his disqualification.
A party seeking to disqualify a judge from a proceeding must file a timely motion.
A party who knows the facts that would form the basis of disqualification prior to entry of a judgment against him waives his right to disqualification of a judge by failing to request disqualification until after the judge enters a judgment adverse to that party.

Bateman v. City of Grand Forks 2008 ND 72
Docket No.: 20070217
Filing Date: 4/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A court's review of special assessments for local improvements is limited to assuring that local taxing authorities do not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or unreasonably.
Special assessments for local improvements are presumed valid, and the burden is on the party challenging the validity to demonstrate they are invalid.
A special assessment against any property must not exceed the benefit the property receives from the improvement.
A special assessment commission has broad discretion to choose the method used to decide benefits and assess individual properties.