Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4831 - 4840 of 12118 results
|
State v. Stensaker (consolidated w/20050454)
2007 ND 6
Highlight: On appeal, jury instructions are fully reviewable. |
|
Donlin v. Donlin
2007 ND 5
Highlight: Property division need not be equal to be equitable, but a substantial disparity must be explained. A long-term marriage supports an equal distribution of property. |
|
State v. Goebel
2007 ND 4
Highlight: Prosecutions for the sexual abuse of child victims are subject to a particular statute of limitations and tolling provision contained in the North Dakota Century Code. |
|
Lucier v. Lucier
2007 ND 3
Highlight: A spousal support obligation may be modified if the district court finds there is a material change in circumstances after examining the reasons for the changes in income and the extent to which the changes were contemplated. |
|
State v. Zahn (CONSOLIDATED W/20060046 & 20060047)
2007 ND 2
Highlight: A party charged with violating a protection order cannot challenge the validity of the protection order without first presenting the argument to the court issuing the order. |
|
Interest of J.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2007 ND 1 Highlight: Mental health orders summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Interest of R.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 258 Highlight: Mental health appeal summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Lawrence v. Delkamp
2006 ND 257
Highlight: A person may waive the rights and privileges to which that person is legally entitled, whether secured by contract, conferred by statute, or guaranteed by the constitution. |
|
State v. Wardner
2006 ND 256
Highlight: A presentence investigation must be conducted before sentencing for gross sexual imposition, but an additional presentence investigation is not required for imposition of a previously suspended sentence after revocation of probation. |
|
Griggs v. Fisher, et al.
2006 ND 255 Highlight: Before addressing the issue of sufficiency of the evidence to support a jury verdict, a losing party must move for judgment as a matter of law under N.D.R.Civ.P. 50 or for a new trial under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59. |