Opinions

Aga v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2006 ND 254
Docket No.: 20060185
Filing Date: 12/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Claimants reapplying for disability benefits have the burden of showing a significant change in their compensable medical condition and an actual wage loss caused by the significant change in their condition.

Interest of R.S. (Confidential) 2006 ND 253
Docket No.: 20060318
Filing Date: 12/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: For mental health commitment, the law allows a court to act on warnings and does not require actual violence or expressed threats.
A mentally ill person, convinced that snipers are out to get him, who, armed with a gun, walks directly into a police station without stopping at the front reception desk may pose a serious risk of harm to others.

Interest of C.L. (Confidential) 2006 ND 252
Docket No.: 20060339
Filing Date: 12/13/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Mental health continuing treatment order summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Disciplinary Board v. Stensland 2006 ND 251
Docket No.: 20060299
Filing Date: 12/12/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Petition of Edison 2006 ND 250
Docket No.: 20060091
Filing Date: 12/5/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An attorney may be disciplined for knowingly serving an answer on behalf of a deceased client.
A knowing act does not require an evil intent or bad purpose, and an act may be done knowingly if it was done in the exercise of the performer's free will and not under coercion.

Disciplinary Board v. Overboe 2006 ND 249
Docket No.: 20060301
Filing Date: 12/4/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered.

State v. Johnson 2006 ND 248
Docket No.: 20060133
Filing Date: 11/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A police officer's belief that many people violate the thirty-day temporary registration law does not give rise to reasonable suspicion that an automobile is not lawfully registered.

Dunnuck v. Dunnuck 2006 ND 247
Docket No.: 20060126
Filing Date: 11/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify child support that is intended to be the final order of the court is appealable.
The party requesting a change in child support must show a material change of circumstances if the motion to amend is brought within one year of the entry of the order sought to be amended.
A district court's decision not to modify a child support obligation because there has been no material change in circumstances is a finding of fact that will not be reversed unless it is clearly erroneous.

State v. Jacob 2006 ND 246
Docket No.: 20060103
Filing Date: 11/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: For negligent homicide, a person must act negligently, causing death. For leaving the scene involving death, a person need only negligently leave an accident scene and fail to render aid where a death occurred.
It is legally and factually possible for a jury to find a person not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of negligent homicide and guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of leaving the scene of an accident involving death.

Harshberger v. Harshberger 2006 ND 245
Docket No.: 20060039
Filing Date: 11/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") establishes the criteria for deciding which state's courts have subject matter jurisdiction to make a child custody decisions involving interstate custody disputes, and subject matter jurisdiction under the UCCJEA cannot be conferred by agreement, consent, or waiver.
The UCCJEA applies to paternity actions only when custody or visitation is an issue.
A subsequent motion in a pending paternity action that implicates the jurisdictional requirements of the UCCJEA does not relate back to the beginning of the original paternity action that did not raise custody or visitation as an issue.
A judgment entered without subject matter jurisdiction is void.