Opinions

State v. Skarsgard 2008 ND 31
Docket No.: 20070223
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b), a defendant is required to make certain motions before trial, and failure to do so may waive defenses under the rule.
The Supreme Court may grant relief from a waiver if the movant establishes just cause.

Lies v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 30
Docket No.: 20070257
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Individuals arrested for DUI must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with counsel before deciding whether to submit to a chemical test.
The failure to allow a DUI arrestee a reasonable opportunity to consult with a lawyer after the arrestee has made such a request prevents the revocation of his driver's license for refusal to take a chemical test.
There are no bright-line rules for determining whether a "reasonable opportunity" to consult with an attorney has been afforded; rather, the determination of whether a reasonable opportunity has been provided turns on an objective review of the totality of the circumstances.

Patten v. State 2008 ND 29
Docket No.: 20070144
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A lawyer must abide by a competent defendant's decision regarding the plea to be entered.
If a defendant is competent and voluntarily pleads guilty, the defendant waives the right to raise the defense of lack of criminal responsibility when the acts occurred.

State v. Kochel 2008 ND 28
Docket No.: 20070174
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Whether an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy is reviewed de novo.

State v. Schmalz (CONSOLIDATED w/20070128) 2008 ND 27
Docket No.: 20070127
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances relied upon by the judge who issues the warrant would lead a person of reasonable caution to believe the contraband or evidence sought probably will be found in the place to be searched.
"Bare-bones" information is not sufficient to satisfy the probable cause requirement for a warrant.
The determination of whether probable cause exists to issue a search warrant is a question of law.
Simply because a warrant application contains some information that is not relevant, or is, in and of itself, insufficient to create probable cause, does not necessarily mean probable cause did not exist to validly issue the warrant.
While the our state constitution may, in certain instances, provide greater individual rights than those afforded under the federal constitution, like the Fourth Amendment, Article I, section 8 of the North Dakota Constitution is not implicated unless a reasonable expectation of privacy is invaded.

Frueh v. Frueh 2008 ND 26
Docket No.: 20070254
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: In considering whether the moving party has established a prima facie case warranting an evidentiary hearing on a motion to change custody, a district court may not weigh conflicting issues of fact raised in the parties' affidavits.
On appeal, the denial of an evidentiary hearing on a motion to change custody is reviewed under an abuse-of-discretion standard.

Matter of Barrera 2008 ND 25
Docket No.: 20070125
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Involuntary civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person is reviewed under a modified clearly erroneous standard of review.
Under the statute for committing a sexually dangerous person, proof of a nexus between the requisite disorder and dangerousness encompasses proof that the disorder involves serious difficulty in controlling behavior and suffices to distinguish a dangerous sexual offender whose disorder subjects him to civil commitment from the dangerous but typical recidivist in a criminal case.

Bertram v. State 2008 ND 24
Docket No.: 20070176
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6), and (7).

Hammer v. Director, ND Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 23
Docket No.: 20070284
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author:

Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

Sandoval v. Department of Transportation 2008 ND 22
Docket No.: 20070295
Filing Date: 2/21/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author:

Highlight: Revocation of driving privileges for three years is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).