Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
481 - 490 of 12428 results
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 2, NECJD
2023 ND 205 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Grand Forks. |
|
Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Hill
2023 ND 204 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
|
Interest of A.I. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2023 ND 203 Highlight: To comply with the requirements of N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-21(1), the district court must find by clear and convincing evidence that alternative treatment is not adequate or hospitalization is the least restrictive alternative. However, we cannot order a less restrictive alternative even if it would be sufficient if evidence shows there is no such program currently available. |
|
State v. Gonzales
2023 ND 202 Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-08, a district court may enter restitution for damages or expenses sustained by a victim that are immediate, intimate, causally connected and directly related to the criminal offense the defendant pleaded guilty or was found guilty. |
|
State v. Ortiz
2023 ND 201 Highlight: A district court’s judgment sentencing a defendant to 55 years of incarceration is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Padilla v. Klimpel, et al.
2023 ND 200 |
|
Interest of E.E.J.-C. (Confidential)
2023 ND 199 Highlight: A juvenile court order denying petition for guardianship of a child is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
State v. Montenegro
2023 ND 198 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury conviction of harassment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
|
Severance v. Howe
2023 ND 197
Highlight: The tort of battery exists at common law. A person is civilly liable for offensive-contact battery if he or she (1) acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other or a third person, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and (2) an offensive contact with the person of the other directly or indirectly results. |
|
State v. Whitetail
2023 ND 196 Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29(a), the district court must enter judgment of acquittal upon a defendant’s motion if the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain a conviction. When the sufficiency of evidence to support a criminal conviction is challenged on appeal, the record is reviewed to determine if there is competent evidence allowing the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting a conviction. The defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. |