Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
41 - 50 of 12097 results
|
Hernandez v. State
2025 ND 176 Highlight: A district court order dismissing an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
|
Corey v. Kenneh
2025 ND 175
Highlight: A disorderly conduct restraining order is affirmed. |
|
State v. King
2025 ND 174
Highlight: Obvious error analysis requires consideration whether the district court clearly deviated from applicable current law. |
|
Olson v. Olson, et al.
2025 ND 173
Highlight: Certified questions from our state district courts have a more stringent standard than foreign courts, requiring the question to be determinative, because the parties have a right to appeal. |
|
State v. Santiago Agosto
2025 ND 172 Highlight: A district court criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Interest of Skorick
2025 ND 171 Highlight: A district court must have sufficient factual findings to show a sexually dangerous individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Past conduct is relevant and may be considered with present conduct to determine if an individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Failure to attend treatment might demonstrate inability to control behavior just as violation of other institutional rules. |
|
Williamson v. Williamson
2025 ND 170 Highlight: A district court's judgment of divorce, order denying reconsideration, and order awarding attorney's fees is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (4), and (6). |
|
Thompson v. City of Adams, et al.
2025 ND 169 Highlight: A district court judgment granting summary judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8). |
|
Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock, et al.
2025 ND 168
Highlight: Valid service of process is necessary to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant. Once a prima facie showing of valid service has been presented, the burden shifts to the defendant to present facts and documentation to establish service of process was insufficient. |
|
Cache Private Capital Diversified Fund v. Braddock, et al.
2025 ND 168
Highlight: Valid service of process is necessary to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant. Once a prima facie showing of valid service has been presented, the burden shifts to the defendant to present facts and documentation to establish service of process was insufficient. |