Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5111 - 5120 of 12118 results
|
Matthews v. State
2005 ND 202
Highlight: Conclusory allegations that counsel failed to call certain witnesses without indicating what the testimony would have been, how it might have affected the outcome of the trial, or what prejudice may have resulted from the failure to call them, do not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. |
|
Interest of P.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2005 ND 201
Highlight: An individual committed to a mental health facility does not enjoy the same level of freedom and rights as an uncommitted individual. |
|
Pfau v. Pfau
2005 ND 200 Highlight: The district court denial of a motion for new trial and a motion for post-judgment relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Steen
2005 ND 199 Highlight: Order denying motion for a new trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Croaker
2005 ND 198 Highlight: Conviction of simple assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Johnson v. State (Cross-Ref. w/20050028 & 20050029)
2005 ND 197 Highlight: Conviction of contact by bodily fluids is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
State v. Stevenson
2005 ND 196 Highlight: Conviction of terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Judicial Vacancy in Judgeship No. 3, Northeast Judicial District
2005 ND 195 Highlight: Judgeship retained at Bottineau. |
|
Interest of J.F. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2005 ND 194 Highlight: Orders finding a child to be unruly and deprived are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Wild Rice River Estates v. City of Fargo
2005 ND 193
Highlight: Whether there has been a taking of private property for public use is a question of law which is fully reviewable on appeal, but a trial court's findings of fact on a takings claim will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous. |