Opinions

Klose v. State (cross-reference w/20010309) 2005 ND 192
Docket No.: 20050044
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An appellant failing to file a trial transcript on appeal assumes the risks and consequences of such failure.

State v. Laib 2005 ND 191
Docket No.: 20050099
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: For the crime of terrorizing, the critical inquiry is whether the defendant intended to place others in fear for their safety.
For the crime of terrorizing, a threat does not have to be made verbally.
For the crime of terrorizing, a communication, either verbal or nonverbal, is sufficient to be a threat if a reasonable person could conclude that it was a threat under the circumstances.

Wetzel v. Schlenvogt (CONSOLIDATED W/20050122) 2005 ND 190
Docket No.: 20050121
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A corporation may not be represented by a non-attorney agent in a legal proceeding.
When a case is commenced on behalf of a corporation by a non-attorney agent, the case and all documents signed by the non-attorney agent are void from the beginning.
Reasonable grounds exist for obtaining a disorderly conduct restraining order when the facts and circumstances presented to the judge are sufficient to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that acts constituting disorderly conduct have been committed.
A disorderly conduct restraining order does not require a pattern of behavior.
The district court does not abuse its discretion in granting a disorderly conduct restraining order when there is sufficient, admissible evidence that disorderly conduct has been committed, whether that evidence is received on direct examination or cross-examination.
Whenever there is a discrepancy between a trial court's oral and written statements, the written statement controls.

State v. Noorlun 2005 ND 189
Docket No.: 20040329
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: On appeal, jury instructions are considered as a whole to determine whether they correctly and adequately advise the jury of the applicable law and do not mislead or confuse the jury.
Whether documentary evidence should be excluded for lack of adequate foundation is within a trial court's discretion, and adequate foundation may be established by circumstantial evidence, including the events preceding, surrounding, and following the transmission of the document.
A conviction rests upon insufficient evidence only when, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving the prosecution the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, no rational fact-finder could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
An information filed in district court before a preliminary examination is not invalid unless the defendant objects to the information before entering a plea.

Johnson v. State 2005 ND 188
Docket No.: 20050230
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A motion for summary disposition of an application for post-conviction relief asking the court to rely solely on the pleadings is treated like a N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b) motion, and under Rule N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a), a ten-day response time should be provided the non-moving party before the trial court rules.
A motion for summary disposition of an application for post-conviction relief asking the court to go beyond the face of the pleadings is treated like a N.D.R.Civ.P. 56 motion, and under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2, the non-moving party in a motion for summary judgment has thirty days to respond.

Laib v. State 2005 ND 187
Docket No.: 20050108
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A defendant who has inexcusably failed to raise an issue on a prior direct appeal may not raise the issue in a subsequent application for post-conviction relief.
A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel must prove that counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that the defendant was thereby prejudiced.
To demonstrate prejudice from ineffective representation, the defendant must establish a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's alleged errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.

Hoff v. Fitterer 2005 ND 186
Docket No.: 20050088
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Under the child support guidelines, in cases of underemployment an obligor's ability to pay child support is not determined solely upon actual income, but also takes into account the obligor's earning capacity.
In cases of underemployment, the child support guideline subsection resulting in the greatest imputed income must be used.

Interest of E.I., Jr. (Confidential) 2005 ND 185
Docket No.: 20050024
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Mohamed 2005 ND 184
Docket No.: 20050156
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A criminal judgment following a conviction for aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Moore 2005 ND 183
Docket No.: 20050144
Filing Date: 11/9/2005
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: Trial court's denial of petitioner's motion to withdraw his guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).