Opinions

Sack v. Sack 2006 ND 57
Docket No.: 20050167
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The disadvantaged-spouse requirement for spousal support is abolished.
Spousal support decisions are to be based on the Ruff-Fischer guidelines.
A court may award items of personal property to a party if the other party agrees to the award in court.

Matter of G.R.H. 2006 ND 56
Docket No.: 20040287
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Involuntary civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person is reviewed under modified clearly erroneous standard of review.
Under statute for committing sexually dangerous person, proof of nexus between the requisite disorder and dangerousness encompasses proof that the disorder involves serious difficulty in controlling behavior and suffices to distinguish a dangerous sexual offender whose disorder subjects him to civil commitment from the dangerous but typical recidivist in a criminal case.
The executive director of the Department of Human Services may decide the least restrictive available treatment for a sexually dangerous individual, and that procedure does not violate due process or double jeopardy.

Sisk v. Sisk 2006 ND 55
Docket No.: 20050232
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Visitation between a non-custodial parent and child is presumed to be in that child's best interests but may be curtailed or eliminated if likely to endanger a child's emotional or physical health.
A trial court must award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the non-custodial parent if there has been a willful and persistent denial of visitation.

Thompson v. Olson 2006 ND 54
Docket No.: 20050091
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Whether injuries rise to the level of serious bodily injuries for purposes of applying the domestic violence presumption against custody is a finding of fact which will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.

State v. Smith 2006 ND 53
Docket No.: 20050181
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions of attempted kidnapping, aggravated assault, and terrorizing are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Feist 2006 ND 52
Docket No.: 20050423
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).

Krall v. State (Consol. w/20050212 & 20050213) (cross-ref. 20000004) 2006 ND 51
Docket No.: 20050211
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of applications for post-conviction relief and motions for default judgment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Arth v. Arth 2006 ND 50
Docket No.: 20050061
Filing Date: 3/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order for dismissal of lawsuit with prejudice is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

State v. Hoverson 2006 ND 49
Docket No.: 20050237
Filing Date: 3/2/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The level of outrageous conduct necessary to prove a due process violation and bar prosecution is quite high and must shock the conscience of the court.
A trial court may permit cross-examination of a witness regarding the underlying facts of a conviction involving dishonesty or deceit.
A trial court may permit cross-examination of a witness regarding specific instances of conduct not resulting in a conviction.
A sentencing court may make reasonable inferences based upon evidence in the record, and those inferences may be a factor in sentencing.

Fischer, et al. v. Berger, et al. 2006 ND 48
Docket No.: 20050182
Filing Date: 2/28/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A use of land creates an easement by prescription if the use is adverse, continuous and uninterrupted, and for the 20-year period of prescription.
The doctrine of acquiescence does not apply to a claim for an easement by prescription for a road across another's property.