Opinions

Tibbetts v. Dornheim 2004 ND 129
Docket No.: 20030267
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Generally, interlocutory orders in an action are merged into the final judgment and may be reviewed on appeal of that judgment.
All of the issues between parties are merged in the final judgment.
A party waives an issue by not providing supporting argument, and without supportive reasoning or citations to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit.

Azure, et al. v. Belcourt Public School Dist. 2004 ND 128
Docket No.: 20030338
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: In a negligence case, duty is a question of whether a relationship between the parties gives rise to any legal obligation; whether a duty exists is a question of law.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the record indicates the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff in a negligence action.

City of Fargo v. Habiger 2004 ND 127
Docket No.: 20030248
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A judge is not obligated to withdraw as judge under the change-of-judge statute if the record does not reflect compliance with statutory procedures.
The waiver of the right to appointed counsel is effective if the waiver is made voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently.
Character evidence may be introduced to demonstrate a defendant's propensity for veracity.

Interest of T.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2004 ND 126
Docket No.: 20030236
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Under federal law, termination of parental rights to an Indian child requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of the child by the parent is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child.
Incarceration of a parent, by itself, does not establish abandonment of a child for purposes of terminating parental rights.
A probability of serious mental and emotional harm to the child may be established from a parent's current inability to properly care for the child.

State v. Ehli (Cross-reference w/20030092) 2004 ND 125
Docket No.: 20030327
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A probation condition prohibiting a sex offender from having contact with his minor children is not a de facto termination of parental rights.

State v. Reimche (Consolidated w/20040003) 2004 ND 124
Docket No.: 20040002
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Assault
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions of aggravated assault are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

City of Minot v. Kary (Consolidated w/20030344) 2004 ND 123
Docket No.: 20030343
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol and unlawful consumption of alcohol are summarily affirmed under 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

State v. Kokron 2004 ND 122
Docket No.: 20040034
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment and sentence for gross sexual imposition are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Mikkelson 2004 ND 121
Docket No.: 20030277
Filing Date: 6/30/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Driving under suspension conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

T.E.J. v. T.S., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2004 ND 120
Docket No.: 20030337
Filing Date: 6/16/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The court may impute income to determine an obligor's future support obligation when the obligor has made a voluntary change in employment.
A court must grant such rights of visitation as will enable the non-custodial parent and child to maintain a parent-child relationship, and the court may restrict or deny this right only if visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health.