Opinions

Foster v. Foster 2004 ND 226
Docket No.: 20040063
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A custody determination should be based on the best interests of the child and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous.
Failure to allow a party 10 days to object to proposed findings of fact before a judgment is filed is harmless error because N.D.R.Ct. 7.1(b)(3) and N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(b) provide a remedy for that party.
A guardian ad litem may make a custody recommendation when advocating the best interests of the child.

Huff v. Board of Medical Examiners 2004 ND 225
Docket No.: 20040151
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: If an act is blatantly illegal or improper, or a licensee admits to a violation, a disciplinary board need not introduce expert evidence to establish the necessary standard.
In a disciplinary proceeding before a medical disciplinary board having some members who are not medical experts and physician members who are medical professionals but may not be experts in the field of medicine practiced by the physician appearing before them, expert testimony in a case in which such testimony would likely be helpful will best protect the fairness of the contested case proceedings, the integrity of the administrative record, and the right to meaningful judicial review.

State v. Linghor 2004 ND 224
Docket No.: 20030360
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Probable cause to arrest an automobile passenger exists where drug paraphernalia is in plain view in the car.
The existence of an arrest is determined objectively, gauged by whether a reasonable person would conclude he was under arrest and not free to leave.
When a jury is unable to reach a verdict and a mistrial results, a subsequent retrial is not double jeopardy.
A trial judge has discretion in declaring a mistrial due to a hung jury, and while reasonable jury deliberation should be encouraged, a judge does not abuse that discretion in declaring a mistrial when the judge asks the jury for a list of divisive issues, polls the jurors to determine whether a verdict could be reached, and spends considerable time consulting both parties regarding available options.

State v. Jaster 2004 ND 223
Docket No.: 20030355
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A current attorney-client relationship with the prosecutor is one of the exclusive causes of an implied bias that warrants dismissal of a juror.
A defendant must exhaust all peremptory challenges before objecting to the denial of a challenge for cause.
A party's right to exercise peremptory challenges is not violated if the party uses a peremptory challenge to exclude a juror the district court refused to excuse for cause, and no biased juror sits.
A statement is inadmissible hearsay only if it is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
The pattern jury instruction on reckless endangerment erroneously omits the term "particular" from the definition of the crime.

State v. Bates 2004 ND 222
Docket No.: 20040095
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Ernst 2004 ND 221
Docket No.: 20040117
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

City of Mandan v. Cordova 2004 ND 220
Docket No.: 20040147
Filing Date: 12/14/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Violation of City Ordinance
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The district court's judgment affirming the prior municipal court decision finding indecent conduct is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Engwicht v. Lako 2004 ND 219
Docket No.: 20040079
Filing Date: 11/26/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The district court's interpretation of an oral contract for well-drilling services is not clearly erroneous, and the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Edwardson v. Lauer 2004 ND 218
Docket No.: 20040110
Filing Date: 11/19/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The clearly erroneous standard of review applies to a district court judgment changing a minor's name under the Uniform Parentage Act.

Bolinske v. Herd, et al. 2004 ND 217
Docket No.: 20040086
Filing Date: 11/19/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The unsolicited referral of an out-of-state lawyer by an in-state lawyer does not provide sufficient contacts to make the out-of-state lawyer amenable to suit in North Dakota. The mere representation of a resident client by a nonresident lawyer does not subject the nonresident lawyer to personal jurisdiction; more is required.
The contacts being used to acquire personal jurisdiction over a nonresident party must be directly related to the litigation.