Opinions

Ralston v. Ralston (cross-ref.w/20020184) 2003 ND 160
Docket No.: 20030104
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A custodial parent does not need court approval to move a child out of state when the noncustodial parent has moved from the state before or after the divorce decree and lives more than fifty miles from the residence of the custodial parent.

Ruggles v. Sabe 2003 ND 159
Docket No.: 20030147
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A vested remainderman has an action for waste against a life tenant.

Alerus Financial v. Lamb, et al. 2003 ND 158
Docket No.: 20030106
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Foreclosure
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: When a motion for enlargement of time is untimely, a court, in its discretion, may grant an enlargement of time only if the failure to file timely was the result of excusable neglect.
An appellant must show the trial court manifestly abused its discretion to overturn a denial of a new trial based on new evidence.
A deficiency judgment is a judgment against a debtor personally for the unpaid balance after a foreclosure sale or a sale of repossessed property fails to satisfy the full amount of the debt.

State v. Faleide (Consol. w/20030076-20030077) 2003 ND 157
Docket No.: 20030075
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A revocation of probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Grewal v. ND Association of Counties, et al. 2003 ND 156
Docket No.: 20030099
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An employer of an independent contractor is not liable for the acts or omissions of the independent contractor unless the employer retains control of the method, manner, and operative details of the independent contractor's work.

State v. Zephyrin 2003 ND 155
Docket No.: 20020352
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal convictions for robbery, felonious restraint, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4) and (7).

Iglehart v. Iglehart 2003 ND 154
Docket No.: 20030063
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Summary judgment is appropriate in a negligence action when the record indicates the defendant did not owe a duty to the plaintiff and was not negligent.

State v. Ballweg (consolidated w/20030052 & 20030053) 2003 ND 153
Docket No.: 20030051
Filing Date: 10/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Facts in a search warrant affidavit are not misleading if there was no reckless or deliberate falsity nor omitted information that would have negated probable cause.
A high degree of suspicion attaches to the collective purchase of ingredients and supplies used to manufacture methamphetamine.
The combination of the presence of anhydrous ammonia, the collective purchase of an amount of Sudafed inconsistent with personal use and other supplies used to manufacture methamphetamine, and concealment of a garage creates a substantial basis to conclude probable cause exists to search a premises for a methamphetamine manufacturing operation.

Disciplinary Board v. Edin 2003 ND 152
Docket No.: 20030272
Filing Date: 9/24/2003
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered.

Interest of Z.C.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2003 ND 151
Docket No.: 20030046
Filing Date: 9/23/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Juvenile Law
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A minor is not in custody and is not entitled to representation by his parents when he is asked common sense investigatory questions during a routine traffic stop.
When there is an odor of alcohol and a minor states he had a sip of alcohol, there is enough evidence to establish he is a minor in consumption of alcohol under N.D.C.C. 5-01-08.
There is no material distinction between consuming alcohol while driving and having recently consumed alcohol while driving. A petition that charges a minor with consuming alcohol while driving is sufficient to inform a minor of the charges against him and allow him to defend against them.