Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

5841 - 5850 of 12118 results

Mayer v. Mayer 2002 ND 109
Docket No.: 20020036
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order refusing to vacate a stipulated divorce decree is summary affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Larson v. McMorrow 2002 ND 108
Docket No.: 20020042
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The district court's issuance of a domestic violence protection order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Taylor 2002 ND 107
Docket No.: 20010306
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The trial court's judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Disciplinary Board v. Edwardson 2002 ND 106
Docket No.: 20020068
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A lawyer who cannot comply with a discovery request without jeopardizing the client should withdraw from representation rather than violate the rules of professional conduct.
Lawyer suspended from the practice of law for 60 days.

State v. Jackson (Consolidated w/20010299) 2002 ND 105
Docket No.: 20010298
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: It is not ineffective assistance of counsel to fail to move for a judgment of acquittal when the prosecution has presented a prima facie case.

Nowling, et al. v. BNSF Railway, et al. 2002 ND 104
Docket No.: 20010302
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Under N.D. Const. art. XII, sec. 13, the right of way for an operating railroad line is a public highway that is not subject to adverse possession or acquiescence.

Corbett v. Corbett 2002 ND 103
Docket No.: 20020010
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: There must be some factual basis in the record for the length of time spousal support is awarded, but a specific plan of rehabilitation is not required.
On questions of spousal support, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court.

State v. Stewart (Consolidated w/20010284) 2002 ND 102
Docket No.: 20010283
Filing Date: 7/11/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(i), for the purpose of attacking the credibility of a testifying accused, evidence that the accused has been convicted of a felony that meets the time limit of subdivision (b) must be admitted if the court determines that the probative value of admitting that evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.
Among the factors for a trial court to consider in weighing the probative value of a prior felony conviction and its prejudicial effect are impeachment value of the prior crime, the time of the conviction and the witness's subsequent history, similarity between the prior crime and the charged crime, importance of the defendant's testimony, and the centrality of the credibility issue.

Hansen, et al. v. Scott, et al. 2002 ND 101
Docket No.: 20010195
Filing Date: 6/10/2002
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A trial court may grant a certification under N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) if the issues raised in the appeal will not be mooted by future developments in the trial court.
Rule 4(b)(2), N.D.R.Civ.P., authorizes North Dakota courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident to the fullest extent permitted by due process.
To establish personal jurisdiction over a nonresident under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2), the requirements of one of the subparagraphs of Rule 4(b)(2) must be satisfied, and the nonresident must have sufficient minimum contacts with North Dakota so the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of substantial justice, fair play, or due process.

Dvorak v. Disciplinary Board 2002 ND 100
Docket No.: 20020127
Filing Date: 6/7/2002
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reinstated to the practice of law.

Page 585 of 1212