Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6461 - 6470 of 12446 results
Kautzman v. Kautzman (Cross ref. w/980004, 990328 & 990386)
2000 ND 190
Highlight: When a party executes on a money judgment to secure a division of property, the debtor is not entitled to an exemption for life insurance policies or annuities. |
Farstveet, et al. v. Rudolph, et al.
2000 ND 189
Highlight: Abandonment of the homestead must be established by clear and convincing evidence that the debtor voluntarily departed from the homestead and left without the intent to return and occupy it as a home. |
State v. Loh
2000 ND 188
Highlight: An officer has probable cause justifying a vehicle stop, based on evidence of a traffic violation, which is not invalidated when an officer subjectively suspects another offense. |
Schaefer, et al. v. Souris River Telecom., et al.
2000 ND 187
Highlight: A stipulation as to foundation does not eliminate a trial court's discretion to reject evidence on grounds of relevance. |
City of Jamestown v. Dardis (CONSOLIDATED W/ 20000110)
2000 ND 186
Highlight: Absent one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement at the time of the entry, evidence gained in violation of the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures is inadmissible under the exclusionary rule. |
Syvertson v. State
2000 ND 185
Highlight: A request for oral argument is incomplete if the requesting party fails to secure a time for oral argument. |
City of Mandan v. Leno
2000 ND 184 Highlight: The limited statutory right of a person arrested for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor to a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney attaches after arrest. |
Anderson v. Resler
2000 ND 183 |
Burlington Northern, et al. v. Benson Co. Water (Cons. w/990369-373;990378-380)
2000 ND 182 |
Fandrich, et al. v. Wells Co. Bd. of Co. Comm., et al.
2000 ND 181
Highlight: While a court may issue a writ of mandamus ordering a government entity to comply with applicable law, it cannot control the government entity's discretion in determining the methods to be used in complying with the law. |