Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
7181 - 7190 of 12359 results
Interest of S.R.B. (Confidential)
830 N.W.2d 565
Highlight: In an expedited appeal taken from an order for hospitalization and treatment, a trial court must make findings of fact specially under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) as to whether the respondent is a person requiring treatment and hospitalization is the least restrictive treatment. |
Palmer v. State (consol.w/20110346-20110348)(cross-ref.w/20010123-20010126)
816 N.W.2d 807 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of its rationale for its decision. |
State v. Gress
803 N.W.2d 607 Highlight: A decision cannot be properly reviewed on appeal if the district court does not provide an adequate explanation of the basis for its decision. |
Estate of Fisk
780 N.W.2d 697
Highlight: The review of fees paid or taken by a personal representative is left to the sound discretion of the district court. |
Miller v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
684 N.W.2d 641
Highlight: Ex parte communications are those that are without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate in the communication. |
Disciplinary Board v. Vela
699 N.W.2d 839 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Disciplinary Board v. Wilkes
673 N.W.2d 614 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Howes v. Kelly Services, Inc.
649 N.W.2d 218
Highlight: In considering a motion for judgment as a matter of law, a trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and must accept the truth of the evidence presented by the non-moving party and the truth of all reasonable inferences from that evidence which supports the verdict. |
Petition to Change Resident Chambers from Watford City to Minot
643 N.W.2d 1 Highlight: Judgeship transferred from Watford City to Minot. |
Mau, et al. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
610 N.W.2d 761 |