Minority Justice Implementation Committee Meeting
Scheduled on Thursday, May 17, 2018 @ 10:00 AM
Minority Justice Implementation Committee
May 17, 201810:00 a.m. Call to Order
ND Supreme Court Training Center (1st Floor), Room 131
State Capitol, Bismarck
and
GoTo Meeting (phone and computer participation)
Current Items:
1.Approval of February 8, 2018 Minutes (meeting materials p. 1-7)
2.Data Collection subcommittee report (meeting materials p. 8-11)
· State examples:i.Minnesota· CSG Policy Framework: Justice Reinvestment in North Dakota (meeting materials p. 22-37)1.Minnesota Judicial Branch Policy 1002 (meeting materials p. 12)ii. Florida1.Article: A Florida Bill Would Make Criminal Justice Data More Transparent Than Ever (meeting materials p. 13-18)iii. California
2.Summary of FL SB 1392 (meeting materials p. 19-20)1.Open Justice: CA DOJ initiative that publishes criminal justice data - https://openjustice.doj.ca.gov/dataiv. Chart of multiple state responses to question regarding collection of race data (meeting materials p. 21)i.Policy Option 8 and 9 regarding data collection (meeting materials p. 32-34)
3.Pretrial subcommittee report (meeting materials p. 38-39)
· March 15, 2018 Pretrial subcommittee agenda and meeting materials (meeting materials p. 40-75)
· New Jersey Courts: 2017 Report to the Governor and Legislature (meeting materials p. 76-112)
· Montanai.SB 59 requires Office of Court Administrator to develop and administer a pretrial program for felony defendants
ii. MT Law and Justice Interim Committee Jan. 2018 Report – Implementation of Criminal Justice System Legislation (meeting materials p. 113-116)
iii. MT Criminal Justice Oversight Council March 2018 Meeting notes and audio (meeting materials p. 117-118)
iv. MT Judicial Branch Admin Policy: pretrial services pilot project allocation (meeting materials p. 119-121)
4.Education/outreach subcommittee report
· Update regarding AIHEC booth
5.Other Business
· Washington New General Rule 37 (meeting materials p. 122-126)i.Expands ban on race-based peremptory challenges to require judges to deny a challenge if an “objective observer” could view race or ethnicity as a factor in the use of the strike