State, et al. v. Wefald, et al.
Docket No. 20050199
Oral Argument:
Argument Date & Time is not set.
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, ex.rel.
Richard Riha in his capacity
as Burleigh County State's
Attorney, Petitioner
v.
Robert O. Wefald, in his
capacity as judge of the
District Court, for Burleigh
County, in the South Central
Judicial District, and P.F., Respondents - Case Type
- CIVIL ORIG. PROCEEDING : WRIT OF SUPERVISION (Civil)
- Appeal From
-
Case No.
Highlight
Briefs
| Filing Date | Description |
|---|
Counsel
| Party | Type | Name |
|---|---|---|
| PETITIONER | ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY | Cynthia Mae Feland - 04804 |
| RESPONDENT | PRIVATE PRACTICE | Thomas M Tuntland - 03250 |
| PETITIONER | ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY | Cynthia Mae Feland - 04804 |
| RESPONDENT | DISTRICT JUDGE | Robert O Wefald - 02985 |
| AMICUS CURIAE | ATT. GENERAL OFFICE | Robert P Bennett - 03146 |
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06/15/2005 | PETITION FILED (Motion in Application for Supervisory Writ & Stay | View |
| 2 | 06/15/2005 | of Proceedings | |
| 3 | 06/15/2005 | - CONFIDENTIAL - | |
| 4 | 06/15/2005 | MOTION FOR Stay (contained in Motion Application for Writ) | |
| 5 | 06/15/2005 | Brief in Support | |
| 6 | 06/15/2005 | Attachments to Brief in Support | |
| 7 | 06/15/2005 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Dist. Ct. Order dated 6-15-05 is temporarily stayed) - Granted | |
| 8 | 06/15/2005 | Order Mailed to Parties | |
| 9 | 06/17/2005 | P.F.'s RESPONSE TO APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT & APPENDIX | |
| 10 | 06/17/2005 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED June 15, 2005 (2 Transcripts) | |
| 11 | 06/17/2005 | DISK - of TRA (One TRA was e-mailed) | |
| 12 | 06/17/2005 | Supplemental Appendix to the Petition | |
| 13 | 06/17/2005 | Response of Attorney General as Amicus Curiae | |
| 14 | 06/17/2005 | Affidavit of Personal Service - Suppl. to Motion in Application for Supervisory Writ (fax) | |
| 15 | 06/20/2005 | DISPOSITION | |
| 16 | 06/20/2005 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (A majority of the Court could not agree to issue a writ, therefore, the - Denied | |
| 17 | 06/20/2005 | Application is deemed denied | |
| 18 | 06/20/2005 | Order Mailed to Parties | |
| 19 | 06/22/2005 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 20 | 10/16/2015 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |