Interest of D.C.S.H.C.
Docket No. 20060337
Oral Argument:
Wednesday, May 9, 2007 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- In the Interest of D.C.S.H.C., a child
------------
Tamera Ressler, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
K.C., Respondent and Appellant
------------
J.B., J.D., B.C., and
Dixie Evans or designee, Lay
Guardian ad Litem, Respondents - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TERMINATION/PARENTAL RIGHTS
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 05-R-00183
East Central Judicial District, Cass County
John Charles Irby
2007 ND 102733 N.W.2d 902
Oral Argument
5/9/2007
Highlight
The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.
A prisoner's due process rights are generally satisfied if the prisoner is represented at a parental-rights-termination hearing by counsel and has an opportunity to appear by deposition or other discovery technique.
In general, there is no denial of due process when the parent testifies at a termination hearing by telephone and is represented by court-appointed counsel during the proceeding.
A North Dakota district court does not have authority to order another state to allow a prisoner to appear in a civil case.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11/22/2006 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 11/20/2006 | |
| 2 | 11/22/2006 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 11/20/2006 | |
| 3 | 11/22/2006 | (This case is consolidated w/20060338. Make all docket entries, except DIS & MAN, in this case) | |
| 4 | 11/22/2006 | (This is a confidential case) | |
| 5 | 12/04/2006 | Substitution of Counsel (Joe A. Johnson replaced Doug Nesheim as counsel for Appellant | |
| 6 | 01/05/2007 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
| 7 | 01/05/2007 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 02/18/2007 | |
| 8 | 01/16/2007 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 15,2006, March 16,2006(morning), March 16,2006(afternoon), & March 17,2006 | |
| 9 | 01/16/2007 | DISK-tra(3/15/2006) electronic, (3/16/2006-a.m.) electronic,(3/16/2006-p.m.) dsk,(3/17/2006) dsk | |
| 10 | 01/18/2007 | RECORD ON APPEAL not rec'd were Tapes (Entry Nos. 10, 17, 20, 24, 26, 35, 47, 51, 52, & 91) | |
| 11 | 02/14/2007 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
| 12 | 02/14/2007 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 03/13/2007 | |
| 13 | 03/13/2007 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
| 14 | 03/13/2007 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
| 15 | 03/13/2007 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
| 16 | 03/13/2007 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
| 17 | 04/11/2007 | Rec'd $25 surcharge for filing fee for ATB | |
| 18 | 04/11/2007 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 19 | 04/12/2007 | DISK - aeb | |
| 20 | 04/13/2007 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | |
| 21 | 04/13/2007 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | |
| 22 | 04/20/2007 | Letter dated April 19, 2007, from Johnson requesting waiver of argument on behalf of both counsel | |
| 23 | 04/25/2007 | Request to waive oral argument on behalf of Appellant and Appellee - Denied | |
| 24 | 05/09/2007 | APPEARANCES: Joe A. Johnson; Constance L. Cleveland | |
| 25 | 05/09/2007 | ARGUED: Johnson; Cleveland | |
| 26 | 05/09/2007 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 27 | 06/26/2007 | DISPOSITION | |
| 28 | 06/26/2007 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | View |
| 29 | 06/28/2007 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
| 30 | 07/19/2007 | MANDATE | |
| 31 | 07/25/2007 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 32 | 09/08/2017 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |