Interest of J.S.L.
Docket Info
- Title
- In the Interest of J.S.L., a child
------------
Grand Forks County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
T.L. , Executive Director,
North Dakota Department of Human
Services, Bismarck, North Dakota, Respondents
and
W.M. , Respondent and Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TERMINATION/PARENTAL RIGHTS
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-R-00369
Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Joel D. Medd
Highlight
In determining whether hearsay evidence has sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness to qualify for the residual hearsay exception, the circumstances surrounding the statement are compared to the closest applicable hearsay exception.
Hearsay evidence is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts only if no other evidence, or very little other evidence, is available on the same point.
The introduction of allegedly inadmissible evidence in a non-jury case will be reversed only if all the competent evidence is insufficient to support the judgment or it affirmatively appears that the incompetent evidence induced the court to make an essential finding which would not otherwise have been made.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 09/11/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/08/2008 | |
2 | 09/11/2008 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 09/08/2008 | |
3 | 09/11/2008 | ----CONFIDENTIAL------- | |
4 | 09/19/2008 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 10/28/2008 | |
5 | 10/23/2008 | TRANSCRIPT DATED August 13, 2008 | |
6 | 10/24/2008 | Certificate of Service of Transcript | |
7 | 10/24/2008 | DISK - tra (8-13-08) | |
8 | 10/24/2008 | RECORD ON APPEAL (Not rec'd: 21, 27, 33, & 51 (Steno Notes) | |
9 | 10/27/2008 | Corrected Certificate of Service of Transcript | |
10 | 12/02/2008 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
11 | 12/02/2008 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
12 | 12/02/2008 | DISK-ATB (E-MAILED) | |
13 | 12/30/2008 | APPELLEE BRIEF (E-FILED) | View |
14 | 12/30/2008 | E-FILED BRIEF (aeb) | |
15 | 01/02/2009 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #18664). | |
16 | 01/06/2009 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
17 | 02/05/2009 | APPEARANCES: Douglas W. Nesheim and W.M., appellant; Marie Miller, 3rd-yr. law student appearing | |
18 | 02/05/2009 | under the rules on the limited practice of law by law students and Jacqueline A. Gaddie, Asst. | |
19 | 02/05/2009 | State's Attorney | |
20 | 02/05/2009 | ARGUED: Nesheim; Miller | |
21 | 02/05/2009 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
22 | 04/02/2009 | DISPOSITION | |
23 | 04/02/2009 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
24 | 04/06/2009 | Judgment E-mailed & Mailed to Parties | |
25 | 04/23/2009 | Corrected Opinion Pages 6 and 15 | |
26 | 04/29/2009 | MANDATE | |
27 | 05/07/2009 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
28 | 11/09/2020 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |