State v. Ripley
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gary Duane Ripley, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 07-K-0136
Southeast Judicial District, Stutsman County
Mikal Simonson
Highlight
When determining whether a trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion to continue a trial, this Court uses the same factors that are used to determine whether a trial court had good cause to grant a motion to continue a trial. The factors are: (1) length of delay; (2) reason for delay; (3) defendant's assertion of his right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant.
The matter of substitution of appointed counsel is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Absent a showing of good cause for the substitution, a refusal to substitute appointed counsel is not an abuse of discretion.
Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(a), any error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights is harmless and must be disregarded.
If a party raises an issue but fails to provide supporting argument, reasoning, or citation to relevant authorities, we deem the argument to be without merit and consider it waived.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 11/12/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 11/10/2008 | |
2 | 11/12/2008 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 11/10/2008 | |
3 | 11/12/2008 | Consolidated w/20080291. Make all entries except for DIS & MAN in this case. | |
4 | 11/14/2008 | Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript | |
5 | 11/14/2008 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 12/30/2008 | |
6 | 12/29/2008 | TRANSCRIPT DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 2008 & September 5, 2008 (2 volumes) | |
7 | 12/29/2008 | DISK - tra (9/4 & 9/5/08) | |
8 | 12/30/2008 | Certificate of Service of TRA | |
9 | 01/02/2009 | RECORD ON APPEAL. (Not rec'd were Entry Nos. 1, 2, 55, and 61). | |
10 | 01/20/2009 | Clerk's Supplemental Certificate of Record on Appeal dated January 15, 2009 (entries 69-70) | |
11 | 01/30/2009 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
12 | 01/30/2009 | ADDENDUM TO APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
13 | 01/30/2009 | DISK - ATB | |
14 | 01/30/2009 | APPELLANT APPENDIX I | |
15 | 01/30/2009 | APPELLANT APPENDIX II | |
16 | 02/04/2009 | Received 8 cc of amended noa & 5 cc of pg 16 for Vol. 1 of ATA | |
17 | 02/25/2009 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | |
18 | 02/25/2009 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) | |
19 | 02/25/2009 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 03/31/2009 | |
20 | 03/30/2009 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
21 | 03/30/2009 | E-FILED BRIEF - AEB | |
22 | 04/01/2009 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt 18781) | |
23 | 04/02/2009 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
24 | 05/04/2009 | APPEARANCES: Benjamin C. Pulkrabek/Jay A. Schmitz, Asst. State's Attny. | |
25 | 05/04/2009 | ARGUED: Pulkrabek/Schmitz | |
26 | 05/04/2009 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
27 | 06/17/2009 | DISPOSITION | |
28 | 06/17/2009 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
29 | 06/18/2009 | Judgment e-mailed to Parties | |
30 | 07/10/2009 | MANDATE | |
31 | 07/15/2009 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
32 | 10/19/2020 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |