Matter of Rush
Docket Info
- Title
- In the Matter of Loring Reil Sky Rush
----------------------
Christopher D. Griffin,
Assistant State's Attorney
for Grand Forks County, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Loring Reil Sky Rush, Respondent and Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CIVIL COMMIT OF SEXUAL PREDATOR
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-R-0477
Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Joel D. Medd
Highlight
In civil commitments of sexually dangerous individuals, the State must prove by clear and convincing evidence a nexus between the individual's disorder and the likelihood that he or she will engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct. Subsequently, the district court must specifically state in its memorandum opinion the facts upon which it relied in finding that such a nexus existed.
The weakness or non-existence of a basis for an expert's opinion goes to their credibility, and not necessarily to the admissibility of the opinion evidence.
While a district court must conduct a commitment proceeding to determine whether an individual is a sexually dangerous individual within sixty days after a finding of probable cause, the court may extend this time period for good cause.
The district court has wide discretion over the mode and order of presenting evidence, and actions of the court regarding the mode and order of presenting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 12/17/2008 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 12/12/2008 | |
2 | 12/17/2008 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 12/12/2008 | |
3 | 12/24/2008 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 01/31/2009 | |
4 | 02/02/2009 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
5 | 02/02/2009 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 02/13/2009 | |
6 | 02/06/2009 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED October 2, 2008 & October 20, 2008 | |
7 | 02/09/2009 | DISK (TRA) (10\02/08 & 10/20/08) | |
8 | 02/09/2009 | RECORD ON APPEAL. Not included were Entry Nos. 8 (error), 23, 52, 69 (steno notes). | |
9 | 03/18/2009 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
10 | 03/18/2009 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
11 | 03/18/2009 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
12 | 03/18/2009 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
13 | 04/13/2009 | Received $33.50 surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #18799) | |
14 | 04/14/2009 | Received copies of ATB from CSD | |
15 | 04/14/2009 | Received copies of ATA from CSD | |
16 | 04/17/2009 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
17 | 04/17/2009 | E-FILED BRIEF - AEB | |
18 | 04/20/2009 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt 18810) | |
19 | 04/22/2009 | Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating | |
20 | 05/11/2009 | APPEARANCES: Darla J. Schuman; Christopher D. Griffin, Asst. State's Attny. | |
21 | 05/11/2009 | ARGUED: Schuman/Griffin | |
22 | 05/11/2009 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
23 | 06/17/2009 | DISPOSITION | |
24 | 06/17/2009 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
25 | 06/18/2009 | Judgment Mailed to Parties | |
26 | 07/13/2009 | MANDATE | |
27 | 07/17/2009 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
28 | 10/09/2020 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |