Search Tips

Tarnavsky v. Rankin

Docket No. 20090085
Oral Argument: Monday, June 8, 2009 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
Edward J. Tarnavsky, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Ron Rankin, Sheriff of McKenzie
County, personnally and in his
professional capacity, Defendant and Appellee
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : TORTS (NEGLIGENCE, LIAB., NUIS.)
Appeal From
Case No. 08-C-071
Northwest Judicial District, McKenzie County
David W. Nelson
2009 ND 149771 N.W.2d 578
Oral Argument 6/8/2009

Highlight

A party resisting a motion for summary judgment must present competent admissible evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact on the party's claims.
A party resisting a summary judgment motion must explain the connection between factual assertions and legal theories in the case and cannot leave to the court the chore of divining what facts are relevant or why facts are relevant let alone material to a claim for relief.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
04/14/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF View
05/14/2009 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Scott Kenneth Porsborg - 04904
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE David Ray Phillips - 06116
APPELLANT PRO SE Edward J. Tarnavsky

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 03/06/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/05/2009
2 04/07/2009 RECORD ON APPEAL
3 04/14/2009 APPELLANT BRIEF View
4 04/14/2009 APPELLANT APPENDIX
5 04/16/2009 DISK - atb
6 04/22/2009 Copies of Notice of Appeal and update for TOC for ATA - inserted
7 05/14/2009 APPELLEE BRIEF View
8 05/14/2009 APPELLEE APPENDIX
9 05/14/2009 E-FILED BRIEF - AEB
10 05/14/2009 E-FILED APPENDIX - AEA
11 05/14/2009 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt 18846)
12 05/19/2009 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
13 05/19/2009 Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD
14 06/08/2009 APPEARANCES: Edward J. Tarnavsky, pro se/David R. Phillips and Scott K. Porsborg
15 06/08/2009 ARGUED: Tarnavsky/Phillips
16 06/08/2009 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
17 07/02/2009 MOTION to Take Judicial Notice (e-filed)
18 07/02/2009 E-FILED MOTION (Motion to Take Judicial Notice)
19 07/17/2009 Response to Motion To Take Judicial Notice
20 08/18/2009 NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion to Take Judicial Notice)
21 08/18/2009 DISPOSITION
22 08/18/2009 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
23 08/18/2009 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
24 08/19/2009 Judgment E-Mailed to Parties
25 09/01/2009 PETITION FOR REHEARING View
26 09/01/2009 DISK-PER
27 09/16/2009 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Pet/Rehearing) - Denied
28 09/29/2009 MANDATE
29 10/01/2009 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
30 01/27/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed