Tarnavsky v. Rankin
Docket No. 20090085
Oral Argument:
Monday, June 8, 2009 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- Edward J. Tarnavsky, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Ron Rankin, Sheriff of McKenzie
County, personnally and in his
professional capacity, Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : TORTS (NEGLIGENCE, LIAB., NUIS.)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-C-071
Northwest Judicial District, McKenzie County
David W. Nelson
2009 ND 149771 N.W.2d 578
Oral Argument
6/8/2009
Highlight
A party resisting a motion for summary judgment must present competent admissible evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact on the party's claims.
A party resisting a summary judgment motion must explain the connection between factual assertions and legal theories in the case and cannot leave to the court the chore of divining what facts are relevant or why facts are relevant let alone material to a claim for relief.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 03/06/2009 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 03/05/2009 | |
| 2 | 04/07/2009 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 3 | 04/14/2009 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
| 4 | 04/14/2009 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
| 5 | 04/16/2009 | DISK - atb | |
| 6 | 04/22/2009 | Copies of Notice of Appeal and update for TOC for ATA - inserted | |
| 7 | 05/14/2009 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 8 | 05/14/2009 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
| 9 | 05/14/2009 | E-FILED BRIEF - AEB | |
| 10 | 05/14/2009 | E-FILED APPENDIX - AEA | |
| 11 | 05/14/2009 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt 18846) | |
| 12 | 05/19/2009 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
| 13 | 05/19/2009 | Received 6 copies of AEA from CSD | |
| 14 | 06/08/2009 | APPEARANCES: Edward J. Tarnavsky, pro se/David R. Phillips and Scott K. Porsborg | |
| 15 | 06/08/2009 | ARGUED: Tarnavsky/Phillips | |
| 16 | 06/08/2009 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 17 | 07/02/2009 | MOTION to Take Judicial Notice (e-filed) | |
| 18 | 07/02/2009 | E-FILED MOTION (Motion to Take Judicial Notice) | |
| 19 | 07/17/2009 | Response to Motion To Take Judicial Notice | |
| 20 | 08/18/2009 | NO ACTION TAKEN (Motion to Take Judicial Notice) | |
| 21 | 08/18/2009 | DISPOSITION | |
| 22 | 08/18/2009 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
| 23 | 08/18/2009 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee | |
| 24 | 08/19/2009 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
| 25 | 09/01/2009 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | View |
| 26 | 09/01/2009 | DISK-PER | |
| 27 | 09/16/2009 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Pet/Rehearing) - Denied | |
| 28 | 09/29/2009 | MANDATE | |
| 29 | 10/01/2009 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 30 | 01/27/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |