Search Tips

Swanson, et al. v. Swanson, et al.

Docket No. 20090289
Oral Argument: Friday, March 19, 2010 2:45pm

Docket Info

Title
Michael Swanson, James Swanson, Robert
Swanson and Candyce Johnson, Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
Glenn K. Swanson, aka G.K. Swanson, Defendant and Appellant
------------------
Maggie McMillan, John F. Renick, Martha E.
Renick, Riley Garrison, Peter Ellingson,
aka Pete Ellingson, George Perrin, Arles O.
Smith, Liberta Smith, Herman Soenke, Etta Soenke,
David Keller, Cynthia Keller, Anna Garrison,
aka Anna Swanson, Asmundur Swanson, William S.
Swanson, the unknown heirs, devisees, legatees
and successors in interest of William S. Swanson,
deceased; Arlo C. Swanson, E. Lorraine Swanson,
as Trustee of the E. Lorraine Swanson Revocable
Trust, any unknown heirs, devisees and legatees
or successors in interest of any of the named
Defendants, be they deceased; all persons unknown
claiming any interest in the property described
in the complaint, Defendants
AND
Glenn K. Swanson, Third Party Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
E. Lorraine Swanson, Third Party Defendant and Appellee
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : REAL PROPERTY
Appeal From
Case No. 08-C-00017
Northeast Judicial District, Bottineau County
Michael G. Sturdevant
2011 ND 74796 N.W.2d 614
Oral Argument 3/19/2010

Highlight

Every person who has actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry and who omits to make such inquiry with reasonable diligence is deemed to have constructive notice of all facts such inquiry would have disclosed had it been properly pursued.
The information sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry may consist of a statement made by the claimant of the adverse ownership right. The information need not be so full or detailed as to communicate a complete description of the adverse interest if it creates a reasonable belief a conflict right exists as a fact.
To comply with the requirement for a reasonably diligent inquiry, a prospective purchaser with actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry must, at the very least, conduct a record search. If a purchaser fails to make a reasonably diligent inquiry, the purchaser cannot claim the protection of a good-faith purchaser status.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
01/04/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
02/19/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF View
03/03/2010 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Michael S McIntee - 03326
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Rudra Tamm - 06103

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 10/05/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/30/2009
2 10/05/2009 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 09/30/2009
3 10/28/2009 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 21, 31, 48, 49, 50, 51, & 52
4 11/18/2009 TRANSCRIPT DATED July 14-15-2009 & C.O.S.
5 11/18/2009 DISK of TRA (e-mailed)
6 01/04/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
7 01/04/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
8 01/04/2010 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK - Granted : 01/04/2010
9 01/04/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
10 01/04/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
11 01/04/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX (E-filed)
12 01/04/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
13 01/07/2010 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19294)
14 01/08/2010 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
15 01/08/2010 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
16 01/29/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
17 01/29/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
18 01/29/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted : 02/19/2010
19 02/17/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
20 02/19/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF View
21 02/19/2010 APPELLEE APPENDIX
22 02/22/2010 DISK-AEB
23 03/03/2010 REPLY BRIEF View
24 03/03/2010 REPLY BRIEF APPENDIX
25 03/03/2010 DISK-RYB (E-MAILED)
26 03/19/2010 APPEARANCES: Rudra Tamm/Michael S. McIntee
27 03/19/2010 ARGUED: Tamm/McIntee
28 03/19/2010 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
29 04/12/2011 DISPOSITION
30 04/12/2011 SPLIT OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen View
31 04/12/2011 (DISSENTING) : Sandstrom, Dale V.
32 04/12/2011 (DISSENTING) : VandeWalle, Gerald W.
33 04/12/2011 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant
34 04/12/2011 Judgment E-Mailed to Parties
35 05/06/2011 MANDATE
36 05/12/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
37 01/27/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed