Swanson, et al. v. Swanson, et al.
Docket Info
- Title
- Michael Swanson, James Swanson, Robert
Swanson and Candyce Johnson, Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
Glenn K. Swanson, aka G.K. Swanson, Defendant and Appellant
------------------
Maggie McMillan, John F. Renick, Martha E.
Renick, Riley Garrison, Peter Ellingson,
aka Pete Ellingson, George Perrin, Arles O.
Smith, Liberta Smith, Herman Soenke, Etta Soenke,
David Keller, Cynthia Keller, Anna Garrison,
aka Anna Swanson, Asmundur Swanson, William S.
Swanson, the unknown heirs, devisees, legatees
and successors in interest of William S. Swanson,
deceased; Arlo C. Swanson, E. Lorraine Swanson,
as Trustee of the E. Lorraine Swanson Revocable
Trust, any unknown heirs, devisees and legatees
or successors in interest of any of the named
Defendants, be they deceased; all persons unknown
claiming any interest in the property described
in the complaint, Defendants
AND
Glenn K. Swanson, Third Party Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
E. Lorraine Swanson, Third Party Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : REAL PROPERTY
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-C-00017
Northeast Judicial District, Bottineau County
Michael G. Sturdevant
Highlight
Every person who has actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry and who omits to make such inquiry with reasonable diligence is deemed to have constructive notice of all facts such inquiry would have disclosed had it been properly pursued.
The information sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry may consist of a statement made by the claimant of the adverse ownership right. The information need not be so full or detailed as to communicate a complete description of the adverse interest if it creates a reasonable belief a conflict right exists as a fact.
To comply with the requirement for a reasonably diligent inquiry, a prospective purchaser with actual notice of circumstances sufficient to put a prudent person on inquiry must, at the very least, conduct a record search. If a purchaser fails to make a reasonably diligent inquiry, the purchaser cannot claim the protection of a good-faith purchaser status.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10/05/2009 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/30/2009 | |
| 2 | 10/05/2009 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 09/30/2009 | |
| 3 | 10/28/2009 | RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 21, 31, 48, 49, 50, 51, & 52 | |
| 4 | 11/18/2009 | TRANSCRIPT DATED July 14-15-2009 & C.O.S. | |
| 5 | 11/18/2009 | DISK of TRA (e-mailed) | |
| 6 | 01/04/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 7 | 01/04/2010 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
| 8 | 01/04/2010 | ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK - Granted : 01/04/2010 | |
| 9 | 01/04/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
| 10 | 01/04/2010 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
| 11 | 01/04/2010 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (E-filed) | |
| 12 | 01/04/2010 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
| 13 | 01/07/2010 | Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19294) | |
| 14 | 01/08/2010 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating. | |
| 15 | 01/08/2010 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating. | |
| 16 | 01/29/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
| 17 | 01/29/2010 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) | |
| 18 | 01/29/2010 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Granted : 02/19/2010 | |
| 19 | 02/17/2010 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 20 | 02/19/2010 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 21 | 02/19/2010 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
| 22 | 02/22/2010 | DISK-AEB | |
| 23 | 03/03/2010 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
| 24 | 03/03/2010 | REPLY BRIEF APPENDIX | |
| 25 | 03/03/2010 | DISK-RYB (E-MAILED) | |
| 26 | 03/19/2010 | APPEARANCES: Rudra Tamm/Michael S. McIntee | |
| 27 | 03/19/2010 | ARGUED: Tamm/McIntee | |
| 28 | 03/19/2010 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 29 | 04/12/2011 | DISPOSITION | |
| 30 | 04/12/2011 | SPLIT OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen | View |
| 31 | 04/12/2011 | (DISSENTING) : Sandstrom, Dale V. | |
| 32 | 04/12/2011 | (DISSENTING) : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | |
| 33 | 04/12/2011 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant | |
| 34 | 04/12/2011 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
| 35 | 05/06/2011 | MANDATE | |
| 36 | 05/12/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 37 | 01/27/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |