Search Tips

State v. Tibor

Docket No. 20090387
Oral Argument: Thursday, April 8, 2010 4:00pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Art Tibor, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
Appeal From
Case No. 05-K-1170
Northwest Judicial District, Williams County
William W. McLees
2010 ND 71789 N.W.2d 731

Highlight

A trial court order denying the defendant's motion for a new trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).


Briefs

Filing Date Description
01/29/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
02/17/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT COURT APPOINTED Mark Taylor Blumer - 04669
APPELLEE ASST. STATE'S ATTORNEY Nathan Kirke Madden - 06518

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 12/21/2009 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 12/17/2009
2 12/21/2009 Notice of Assignment of Appellate Attorney - Mark T. Blumer to replace Kent M. Morrow as counsel
3 12/21/2009 for appellant
4 01/25/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
5 01/25/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
6 01/25/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 01/29/2010
7 01/29/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
8 01/29/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
9 01/29/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
10 01/29/2010 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
11 02/01/2010 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19328)
12 01/28/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (2 Vol.) and separates including Transcripts #33, 189, 199, 200, & 201, and sealed
13 01/28/2010 Exhibits, PSI, Pshyc. Eval. and Victim Impact Statements
14 02/04/2010 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
15 02/04/2010 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
16 02/05/2010 Received $17 surcharge for excess ATA (Receipt #19342)
17 02/17/2010 APPELLEE BRIEF View
18 02/17/2010 E-FILED BRIEF - AEB
19 02/18/2010 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #19364)
20 03/10/2010 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating
21 03/22/2010 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
22 03/23/2010 Request for waiver of oral argument on behalf of Appellant
23 03/25/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request for waiver of oral argument on behalf of Appellant) - Granted
24 03/25/2010 Sua Sponte waiver of Appellee's argument
25 03/25/2010 Sua Sponte waiver of Appellee's oral argument granted under Rule 34(a)(2)
26 04/08/2010 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
27 04/08/2010 ARGUED: Waived
28 05/11/2010 DISPOSITION
29 05/11/2010 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Per Curiam View
30 05/11/2010 Judgment Sent to Parties
31 05/25/2010 PETITION FOR REHEARING (e-filed) View
32 05/25/2010 E-FILED BRIEF (Pet/Rehearing)
33 05/27/2010 Received 7 copies of PER from CSD
34 06/10/2010 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER) - Denied
35 06/23/2010 MANDATE
36 07/02/2010 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE