Search Tips

Leno v. K & L Homes

Docket No. 20100347
Oral Argument: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
Neal A. Leno and
Susan A. Leno, Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
K & L Homes, Inc., a
North Dakota Corporation, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CONTRACTS
Appeal From
Case No. 09-C-00429
South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Gail Hagerty
2011 ND 171803 N.W.2d 543
Oral Argument 4/26/2011

Highlight

North Dakota law provides an implied warranty of fitness for the purpose in construction contracts, which is based in contract law.
Fault and comparative fault do not apply to a breach of implied warranty cause of action based in contract law.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
02/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
03/14/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
03/28/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Kara Jean Erickson - 06287
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Paul Reginald Sanderson - 05830
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Chris A Edison - 05362
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Larry L Boschee - 04293

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 10/21/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/20/2010
2 10/21/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/20/2010
3 10/21/2010 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : Sandstrom, Dale V.
4 11/01/2010 Acknowledgment of OTR & RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 12/09/2010
5 11/24/2010 STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
6 12/09/2010 TRANSCRIPT DATED 8/24/10, 8/26/10, 8/31/10, 9/1/10 and 9/2/10 & C.O.S.
7 12/09/2010 DISK-TRA (8/24/10, 8/26/10, 8/31/10, 9/1/10 and 9/2/10) e-mailed
8 12/10/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL and Separates (entry nos. 39, 62 - 66)
9 12/15/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
10 12/15/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 02/01/2010
11 01/25/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
12 01/25/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
13 01/26/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 02/14/2011
14 02/02/2011 1st Supplemental Clerk's Certificate of Record (entry nos. 95 & 96)
15 02/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
16 02/11/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
17 02/11/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
18 02/11/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX
19 02/14/2011 Received $25.00 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20181)
20 02/16/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
21 02/16/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
22 03/14/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
23 03/14/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
24 03/15/2011 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20222)
25 03/16/2011 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
26 03/22/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
27 03/25/2011 SITTING WITH THE COURT : McClintock, Jr., John C.
28 03/28/2011 REPLY BRIEF (e-filed) View
29 03/28/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
30 03/30/2011 Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
31 04/18/2011 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION : VandeWalle, Gerald W.
32 04/19/2011 SITTING WITH THE COURT : Graff, Benny A.
33 04/26/2011 APPEARANCES: Chris A. Edison; Paul R. Sanderson and Kara J. Johnson
34 04/26/2011 ARGUED: Edison/Sanderson
35 04/26/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
36 09/02/2011 DISPOSITION
37 09/02/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
38 09/02/2011 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellees
39 09/02/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
40 09/07/2011 NOTICE & STIPULATION TO SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
41 09/19/2011 Stipulation for entry of mandate
42 09/20/2011 MANDATE
43 11/14/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE