Sorenson v. Slater
Docket No. 20110015
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, September 13, 2011 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- Tim Sorenson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
Jana Slater, Respondent and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-R-00113
Northwest Judicial District, Williams County
Gerald H. Rustad
2011 ND 216806 N.W.2d 183
Oral Argument
9/13/2011
Highlight
When the Supreme Court remands for redetermination of an issue without specifying the procedure to be followed, the district court may decide the issue on the basis of the evidence already before it or may take additional evidence.
Although the results of a polygraph examination are not generally admissible in a criminal trial unless the parties have stipulated to their admissibility, there is no definitive rule for admissibility of polygraph results in other contexts.
A party seeking to introduce polygraph evidence must present scientific evidence establishing the reliability of polygraph examination results.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01/12/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 01/06/2011 | |
| 2 | 01/12/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 01/06/2011 | |
| 3 | 02/01/2011 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL : 02/25/2011 | |
| 4 | 02/24/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT (e-filed) | |
| 5 | 02/24/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MTR) | |
| 6 | 02/24/2011 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT (MTR) - Granted : 03/01/2011 | |
| 7 | 02/26/2011 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED September 9, 2010 & November 8, 2010 & C.O.S. | |
| 8 | 02/26/2011 | DISK - tra (9/9/10 & 11/8/10) (e-mailed) | |
| 9 | 03/01/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL & SEPARATES (ENTRY NOS. 47, 95 & 103). | |
| 10 | 03/30/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
| 11 | 03/30/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 05/06/2011 | |
| 12 | 05/03/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 13 | 05/03/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
| 14 | 05/03/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE - Granted : 05/13/2011 | |
| 15 | 05/11/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
| 16 | 05/11/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
| 17 | 05/11/2011 | DISK-ATB (E-MAILED) | |
| 18 | 06/07/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
| 19 | 06/07/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 07/11/2011 | |
| 20 | 06/27/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | |
| 21 | 06/27/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) | |
| 22 | 06/29/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MAE) - Granted : 07/13/2011 | |
| 23 | 07/13/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 24 | 07/13/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
| 25 | 07/13/2011 | DISK - aeb (e-mailed) | |
| 26 | 07/19/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 27 | 08/29/2011 | 1st Suplemental Clerk's Certificate of Appeal (entry nos. 124-127) | |
| 28 | 09/13/2011 | APPEARANCES: Kevin Chapman and Tim Sorenson/Brenda Neubauer and Jana Slater | |
| 29 | 09/13/2011 | ARGUED: Chapman/Neubauer | |
| 30 | 09/13/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 31 | 11/15/2011 | DISPOSITION | |
| 32 | 11/15/2011 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Maring, Mary Muehlen | View |
| 33 | 11/15/2011 | (CONCUR IN THE RESULT) : Crothers, Daniel John | |
| 34 | 11/15/2011 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant | |
| 35 | 11/15/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
| 36 | 11/25/2011 | Mot. Ext/Time Petition for Rehearing | |
| 37 | 11/25/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MPR) - Granted : 12/07/2011 | |
| 38 | 12/08/2011 | Mot. Ext/Time Petition for Rehearing (letter from Brenda Neubauer) | |
| 39 | 12/08/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK - Granted | |
| 40 | 12/08/2011 | PETITION FOR REHEARING of Defendant | View |
| 41 | 12/08/2011 | DISK - PER (e-mailed) | |
| 42 | 01/12/2012 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER) - Denied | |
| 43 | 01/20/2012 | MANDATE | |
| 44 | 05/30/2012 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 45 | 06/04/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |