Wong v. State
Docket No. 20110088
Oral Argument:
Thursday, September 8, 2011 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- Alman Andrew Wong, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-K-00880
South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Bruce B. Haskell
2011 ND 201804 N.W.2d 382
Oral Argument
9/8/2011
Highlight
To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the petitioner must overcome the strong presumption that an attorney's representation is reasonable.
If the petitioner fails to show that his or her attorney's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the Court need not analyze whether the petitioner was prejudiced by the attorney's representation.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
| Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 04/05/2011 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/01/2011 | |
| 2 | 04/05/2011 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 04/01/2011 | |
| 3 | 04/27/2011 | RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 28, 29, & 30 (Not rec'd were Exhibits attached to #61) | |
| 4 | 05/10/2011 | 1st Supplemental Clerk's Certificate of Record dated 5/18/11 (Entry No. 61 - Exhibits 1 & 2). | |
| 5 | 05/17/2011 | TRANSCRIPT DATED March 16, 2011 & C.O.S. | |
| 6 | 05/17/2011 | DISK - tra (3/16/11) (e-mailed) | |
| 7 | 06/02/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
| 8 | 06/02/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
| 9 | 06/02/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
| 10 | 06/02/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) | |
| 11 | 06/02/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20341) | |
| 12 | 06/06/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD | |
| 13 | 06/06/2011 | Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD | |
| 14 | 07/01/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
| 15 | 07/01/2011 | DISK - AEB (CD) | |
| 16 | 07/19/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
| 17 | 09/08/2011 | APPEARANCES: Benjamin C. Pulkrabek; Brian D. Grosinger | |
| 18 | 09/08/2011 | ARGUED: Benjamin C. Pulkrabek; Brian D. Grosinger | |
| 19 | 09/08/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
| 20 | 10/18/2011 | DISPOSITION | |
| 21 | 10/18/2011 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : VandeWalle, Gerald W. | View |
| 22 | 10/19/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
| 23 | 10/28/2011 | PETITION FOR REHEARING (e-filed) | View |
| 24 | 10/28/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (PER) | |
| 25 | 10/31/2011 | Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD | |
| 26 | 11/15/2011 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - PER - Denied : 11/15/2011 | |
| 27 | 11/28/2011 | MANDATE | |
| 28 | 12/01/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
| 29 | 06/18/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |